English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

1. Pro-life except in the case of danger to the mother.
2. Support of same-sex marriages.
3. Against the death penalty.
4. For the closely monitored use of medical marijuana, but not for legalizing it otherwise.
5. On immigration: providing a way for illegal immigrants who are found to be productive in society and clearly are not terrorists to achieve citizenship. And to allow an increase in immigrants who are trying to escape from terrible conditions. But of course, all this must be done without increasing the chances of allowing terrorists to enter.
6. For the Patriot Act.

2007-09-11 02:01:49 · 6 answers · asked by Heron By The Sea 7 in Politics & Government Elections

open4one:
Obviously, it matters very much where the candidates stand on these issues, because the president most certainly has a say on these issues. They can sign or not sign a partial birth abortion ban. They can seek to redefine marriage as between a man or a woman, etc. So it does matter. I'm not sure what your point is.

2007-09-11 12:36:29 · update #1

6 answers

Here are some sites that might help you.
http://votesmart.org/index.htm
http://www.yournextpresident.net/thefacts.php
http://votesmart.org/election_president_search.php?type=alpha
http://www.2decide.com/table.htm

The only issues I support and agree with on in your list is Pro-Life and marijuana for medicine, but that's not what you're asking for in your question.

2007-09-11 02:44:48 · answer #1 · answered by Naturescent 4 · 2 1

Just to let you know...

1. Is not a proper federal concern, and certainly not a matter for the president to decide.
2. See point #1
3. See point #1
4. Recreational drug use is not a federal concern, and neither is deciding what constitutes "medicine"
5. This is the one thing in the list so far that is a federal concern, but it's for the legislature to establish a uniform system of naturalization.
6. Who but a lawyer would be in favor of an Act that is wholly unintelligible to anyone but another lawyer? Read it for yourself and you'll see what I mean by that.

2007-09-11 02:21:27 · answer #2 · answered by open4one 7 · 4 2

Take this quiz and see:

http://www.speakout.com/VoteMatch/senate2006.asp?quiz=2008

I did the quiz for you based on those views and it came out to Sam Brownback, then Hillary Clinton

...now there's a stark contrast in views. Decide for yourself.

2007-09-11 02:13:06 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

i understand instructor, i understand, call on me. Ron Paul. HAHAHAHAHA. One problem. He has continually called for much less involvement of the government in our every day lives. So while did he drop that concept to take administration of what human beings think of, the place they artwork, who they worker, administration of congress(Separation of powers) safeguard democracy from his gold mines. using fact the marketing campaign maintains you human beings get issues crossed up and purely tutor my contentions.

2016-10-10 09:09:35 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

No one.

If these are your views you seem way too logical.

If all your views lined up with any of these nut jobs I'd have you commited.

2007-09-11 02:11:50 · answer #5 · answered by Towelie 4 · 4 1

no one that i know of...maybe rudy...don't know how he feels about pot

2007-09-11 02:12:33 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers