English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

She was the last British monarch of the House of Hannover, but was her last name Hanover?

2007-09-11 01:46:56 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Royalty

11 answers

Queen Victoria had no last name. She was of the House of Hanover, but the monarchs had not had any reason for a last name for centuries. Prince Albert (of the House of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha) commissioned an enquiry by the British & German Colleges of Heralds (or equivalent), and they eventually came up with a name for him of Wettin. Queen Victoria adopted this name by marriage and her children are listed on official records that require a surname as Wettin.
King Edward VII retained the surname but was of the house of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha, as was his son George V until he changed it in 1917 to Windsor because of anti-German sentiment among the British people.
Prince Philip is of the House of Schleswig-Holstein-Sonderburg although his surname is Mountbatten (formerly Battenburg), but the monarch's House takes precedence.

2007-09-11 03:47:11 · answer #1 · answered by Duffer 6 · 5 2

Queen Victoria Family

2016-09-29 04:15:54 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

As she belonged to the House of Hannover, that makes her last name Hannover, as the Royal family tend to use the name of their dynasty a stheir last name when they require to use one. Queen Victoria would never have signed her name Victoria Hannover though, it would be Victoria R (R satands for Regina which is the latin for Queen). She was married to Albert of Saxe-Coburg-Gotha so it could be argued that her surname was Saxe-Coburg-Gotha from the time of her marriage to Prince Albert, royalty so seldom use surnames that it never really feautured. The reason that they do not use surnames is that they are regarded as being of the country they rule, Victoria of Great Britain, it is a special status awarded to most sovereigns.

2007-09-11 02:49:58 · answer #3 · answered by ccsmall1 2 · 2 1

Not that Alexandrina Victoria, Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland and Empress of India, needed a last name, but she was the last monarch of the House of Hanover. Since she married her first cousin, Prince Albert of Saxe-Coburg and Gotha, her descendants up until 1919 were part of the House of Saxe-Coburg Gotha. Rumors of an affair with a solicitous Scots' manservant, John Brown, earned her the nickname, "Mrs. Brown".

2007-09-11 02:48:01 · answer #4 · answered by Ellie Evans-Thyme 7 · 4 1

This is a hard one to answer. Royalty don't really have a second name. Instead they have a house name, the current one being the House of Windsor. However this is normally used for a second name if one is required. When the Queen served in World War II she was listed as Elizabeth Windsor. However since she has become Queen you will notice that she often signs EIIR or Elizabeth Regina. So you could argue that she is using Regina (Queen) as her second name. Then comes the rest of the family. Untitled descendants of the Queen have the second name Mountbatten-Windsor. Those titled are suppose to be of the House of Windsor still but often the Queens grandchildren use their parents title as a surname. For instance when Prince William graduated his name was called "William Wales"

2016-04-04 01:50:27 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The British royal family changed their last name from Saxe-Coburg-Gotha to Windsor in 1917. The reason? World War One broke out in 1914 and anit-German sentiment was at its height in 1917. In protest, King George V renounced all the German titles belonging to him and his family and adopted the name of his castle, Windsor.

You might find these interesting
http://www.samsloan.com/secret.htm
http://www.heraldica.org/faqs/britfaq.html#p2-1

2007-09-11 02:03:20 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Victoria was her last name!

"Princess Alexandrina Victoria was born on May 24, 1819 to the Duke and Duchess of Kent. Victoria as she was called was the granddaughter of King George III."

2007-09-11 01:57:01 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

Sax-Coburg Goetha

2007-09-11 01:54:55 · answer #8 · answered by Avondrow 7 · 2 4

Insofar as she had a "last name", it was Hanover.

2007-09-11 02:06:06 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 4

her last name was greedy, like the present mob.

2007-09-11 02:48:23 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 4

fedest.com, questions and answers