English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

My question is really simple. Why would the Bush Admintsration want to kill over 3,000 lives. Or demolish buildings that they would have to rebuild.

2007-09-11 01:42:18 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

How can you say that those buildings were blown up by bombs. If you look in the media videos of the towers you see two planes hitting the towers. What you think are bombs going off on the lower floors as the building collapsing is actually the floors falling on each other and causing dust to blow out the windows

2007-09-11 04:45:50 · update #1

How can you say that those buildings were blown up by bombs. If you look in the media videos of the towers you see two planes hitting the towers. What you think are bombs going off on the lower floors as the building collapsing is actually the floors falling on each other and causing dust to blow out the windows

2007-09-11 04:45:53 · update #2

14 answers

9-11!.
i don't know. just don't! i'm told all the "facts", and feel sorry for those who died, more so for those left heart broken because of what happened. yet too suggest that the powerful would not kill 3,000 and more that day is questioned by this white Westerner.
I couldn't give a s-h-i-t looking at conspiracy theory's and the like. I seek facts, and weigh Z fact up with what i know, and something about that day doesn't ring true too me, i can't pin point it, nor do i spend much time thinking about it, but given you ask i felt i should share my main question about the whole thing.
how dose a plane flying into those buildings make them crumble into it'self so neatly? and don't say it's an engineering problem, i'm in that game and i don't see it going that way.
so like i say i know nothing, yet distrust the official story.

2007-09-11 02:23:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The so much hoary, trite, cliched conspiracy theories in Rock History one million Courtney Love killed Kurt Cobain two Robert Plant, John Bonham, and Jimmy Page all offered their souls to Satan three Elvis Presley and Jim Morrison's deaths had been hoaxes Some of probably the most ridicluous I've heard for sheer lulz Neal Peart was once changed by means of one other Drummer for awhile within the past due 70's technology. The "Other Drummer" exerted a Satanic affect over Rush Ozzy and Gene Simmons had a "Gross Out" contest the concerned (Among different matters) ant-consuming and animal head-biting off. Rod Stewart had roughly a quart of a *ahem "substance" (that comes from a male) pumped from His belly in a ER.

2016-09-05 10:01:04 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Because there have been so many pictures of before and after with bomb holes after, and people's stories of explosions that they believe could have only been caused by bombs, people start to dig a little deeper. When they dig a little deeper, they find that there are many conflicts from what happened and what was reported.

How can anyone know what goes through the minds of those who plan such attacks? Their thoughts are cruel and sinister - regardless of who is responsible.

Look at Hitler and what he did during the Holocaust. How could anyone dream up such torture to so many people while a government and its people let it happen and then became helpless victims?

These things don't happen overnight. They are planned ahead of time and spoon-fed to people one bite at a time until they believe whatever you tell them. Freedom to socialism to tyranny/communism - Government Control.

If terrorists could hi-jack jets, why wouldn't they be able to plant bombs? If there wasn't such an effort to cover up the explosions, maybe people be more likely to believe the reports.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8n-nT-luFIw&mode=related&search=

Fuel from the jets could have flowed throughout the buildings and caused explosions. You have to consider that there must have been pressure since there were no open windows - just standard office windows that don't open. This could have created the "bursts" instead of just quickly spreading as it would with open windows.

I can't explain this one.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-59kouBgO_s&eurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww%2Eprisonplanet%2Ecom%2Farticles%2Fseptember2007%2F060907Video%2Ehtm

2007-09-11 02:06:25 · answer #3 · answered by Naturescent 4 · 1 1

War is A Racket
http://mlf1070.wordpress.com/2007/08/27/war-is-a-racket/

2007-09-11 01:50:46 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

There are people out there who believe Elvis is alive and working at a service station somehwere in Minnisota. And others that believe Usama Bin Laden is living at Bush's ranch in Crawford, TX. But then there are those who believe in Santa Claus, Easter Bunny, and Good Faries too.

As Einstein said,"There are two things infinite. Space and stupidity. I'm not sure about space. But i am sure about stupidity".

2007-09-11 02:18:58 · answer #5 · answered by namsaev 6 · 0 3

It is a demented underground movement created for the sole purpose of political gain and to instill doubt. Many involved, are not even from this country.

I believe that we have a right to question our government and many things that are happening and evolving within it. However, these people have gone overboard to the extent that it's frightening. Would you entrust these people to get into power? I would not.

2007-09-11 01:55:23 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

Money, power, votes. They don't give a damn about people. More people than that die every year from not having adequate health care.

I'm not sure I agree with the conspiracy theorists, but they certainly do have a point.

2007-09-11 01:49:47 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

ur right except Bush adminsitration is not rebuilding the freedom tower

2007-09-11 01:47:13 · answer #8 · answered by de viking 4 · 1 0

A simple answer would be carte blanche to invade and subjugate the Middle East

2007-09-11 01:53:28 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

There is always a certain lunitic fringe that will grab the least likely scenario and try to make it real, even when the obvious answer is staring them in the face. Okham's razor is not a principle they are familiar with.

2007-09-11 01:50:49 · answer #10 · answered by booman17 7 · 2 3

fedest.com, questions and answers