why do u say so?
2007-09-11 00:47:42 · 7 answers · asked by cutie_cathy 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
No. The person is still out there and able to commit crimes. Death rids society of the unreformable.
2007-09-11 01:54:18 · answer #1 · answered by Caninelegion 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I guess it would be better if you're not into the whole dying thing...
It would probably be messier though.
It would also hurt a lot more.
It would definitely be really cool to watch however.
Yeah, I think I'm going to stick with death penalty... I'd rather just fall asleep forever with the prick of a needle than live through the agonizing pain of having an arm or leg sawed off and then live the rest of my life like a freak (no offense to amputees)
2007-09-11 07:57:24 · answer #2 · answered by Laibach 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
More harsh but that would be considered cruel and unusual punishment and the ACLU would have a field day in court with that.
I just say child predators should be shot in the face.
2007-09-11 07:54:02 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Amputate what ?
if the punishment should fit the crime-
a thief will lose his hands...
a pedo loses his pen1s..
a liar loses his tongue...
an embezzler loses his bezzle ?
2007-09-11 11:44:18 · answer #4 · answered by sirbobby98121 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
That depends on the individual and the circumstances.
2007-09-11 08:10:34 · answer #5 · answered by DrIG 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Be easier to tell whom the criminals where LOL
2007-09-11 08:05:44 · answer #6 · answered by Army Retired Guy 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe the punishment should fit the crime. Rape, you know what goes. Steal: one finger steal again....... Kill someone : kill their loved one. Radical yes but fitting.
2007-09-11 07:55:06 · answer #7 · answered by PATRICIA MS 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋