Could George Bush have rigged the 2000 Election. Diebold voting machines easily hacked!?

Question

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GamR4y_ykA0&NR=1

Study at Princeton, with full technical paper explains how @
website: http://itpolicy.princeton.edu/voting

Shows exactly how easy it would be for someone with access to one voting machine to take advantage of malicious code and infect and rig an entire election with a simple virus, that would be able to steal votes and cover its tracks.
So easily when your brother is in control of the election as Jeb Bush was, in Florida.

This shows it can be done..and we all know who was capable of doing it in 2000.

The real concern is contacting your representatives and having them change the voting procedures for use of the Diebold voting machines for the next elections.

Answer 1

Yes, if election had been honest he would have lost more than he did.

Answer 2

As a rule, I'm skeptical of conspiracy theories. In the case of manipulation of electronic voting data, I've seen more than enough to make me very concerned that, yes, an election can be rigged. There are a lot of statistics supporting the hypothesis that some elections have already been determined by electronic data manipulation. Diebold grabs the headlines, of course, due to its owner making the unfortunately public promise to do everything he could to insure Bush became President. But I don't believe Diebold is uniquely vulnerable to electronic manipulation.

One thing is certain: government has a vested interest in reassuring us the voting process is fair and accurate. It doesn't seem too worried about the growing skepticism and cynicism in the body politic. Perhaps most surprising of all is the fact that the Democrats -- clearly the victims of the alleged manipulations -- don't seem interested or concerned at all. Leaves room for lots of speculation about why this is.

Answer 3

Mark A is nice. After the Florida debacle, there are 4 significant newspapers (such using fact the enormous apple situations) that arranged for hand-counting the finished Florida vote (and, no longer purely the 4 counties in question). In all 4 circumstances, Bush gained by a bigger margin than the machines. perhaps Gore had the machines rigged!

Answer 4

In Florida , GOP Goons planned a way to derail the election, disenfrancise thousands of voters by accident and get the USSC to apporint Bush to the presidency. But yes, 2000 was a stolen election. In 2004 Diebold played a role in securing OHIO for the GOP. We need to get rid of eletronic voting systems altogether.

Answer 5

The results of the 2000 Presidential Election are irrelevant. The outcome was decided in court in an unprecedented Presidential Appointment, and the decision has stood (Supreme Court, Bush v. Gore).

The more relevant issues would be those surrounding the 2004 elections.

Answer 6

the 2000 election was rigged!!

And yes, the Diebold machines are easy to flip! And you have no trail. Monkey in, monkey out!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z3hUPP_bdOo

Answer 7

no one was using Diebold machines in 2000. they came after 2000 after you libs screamed you wanted electronic voting. they gave it to you, and now of course you all have to complain about that as well. If republicans are so great at fixing elections, how come the democrats control both houses of congress?

Answer 8

Well, there was a problem when Al Gore was running. To me it was suspicious. Voting can be rigged easily. Go to www.prisonplanet.com>. See what you think. of that site as well.

Answer 9

Get a reality check, do you remember when John F. Kennedy won? They said even dead people voted. It was actually proven in Chicago that people that were dead for hundreds of years were casting votes! IF the Republicans got one this time, I say good for them. Unfortunately I don't think they did. The Republicans seem to be the only ones playing by the rules these days.

Answer 10

And the typical democrat complaint is............. WAAA WAAAA sniff MOMMMMMMIE