English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The taliban leadership
Mullallah Omar

Up con's butts, thats where., Cause the GOP has done NOTHING!!!!!

2007-09-10 17:47:42 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

"I'm genuinely not concerned about Osama Bin Laden"
George W Bush 2003

Ummm.... maybe you should get a source of info other than AM radio. The Taliban controls most of Afghanistan still.


Man, you cons are stupid!

2007-09-10 17:57:31 · update #1

What did the liberals do?

WHOOPS! Someone did their homework! LMFAO!

When Republicans couldn't prevent executive action, President Clinton:

-- Developed the nation's first anti-terrorism policy, and appointed first national coordinator.

-- Stopped cold the planned attack to blow up 12 U.S. jetliners simultaneously.

-- Stopped cold the planned attack to blow up UN Headquarters.

-- Stopped cold the planned attack to blow up FBI Headquarters.

-- Stopped cold the planned attack to blow up the Israeli Embassy in Washington.

--Stopped cold the planned attack to blow up Boston airport.

-- Stopped cold the planned attack to blow up Lincoln and Holland Tunnels in NY.

-- Stopped cold the planned attack to blow up the George Washington Bridge.

-- Stopped cold the planned attack to blow up the US Embassy in Albania.

Tried to kill Osama bin Laden and disrupt Al Qaeda through preemptive strikes (efforts denounced by the G.O.P.).

2007-09-10 18:00:22 · update #2

Detected and destroyed cells of Al Qaeda in over 20 countries

-- Created a national stockpile of drugs and vaccines including 40 million doses of smallpox vaccine.

-- Robert Oakley, Reagan Counterterrorism Czar says of Clinton's efforts "Overall, I give them very high marks" and "The only major criticism I have is the obsession with Osama"

-- Paul Bremer, Bush's Administrator of Iraq disagrees slightly with Robert Oakley saying he believed the Clinton Administration had "correctly focused on bin Laden. "

-- Barton Gellman of the Washington Post put it best, "By any measure available, Clinton left office having given greater priority to terrorism than any president before him" and was the "first administration to undertake a systematic anti-terrorist effort."

2007-09-10 18:00:39 · update #3

10 answers

Sitting in their penthouse condos Uptown New York.

2007-09-10 17:54:34 · answer #1 · answered by Dionannan 5 · 0 3

Let's see WTC bombing 1993 under the Clintoon administration, USS Cole bombing under the Clintoon administration. What did Bill do??? HE got a BJ in the oval office! He didn't go to Disneyland, he went to Monicaland. How appropriate for a Democratic president. Kind of makes whats been going on with Larry Craig and Mark Foley look tame. Clintoon had 8 years, he did nothing. President Bush had 8 months.....lets see 8 years or 8 months? You do the math.

2007-09-11 01:21:14 · answer #2 · answered by ? 6 · 0 0

Republicans have done nothing? Let's review junior.....

Bush responded to the September 11th terrorist attacks with the War on Terror—led a coalition to defeat the terrorist-supporting regimes in Afghanistan and Iraq, liberated 50 million people, and began rebuilding Afghanistan and Iraq. WHAT HAVE THE LIBERALS DONE?

Bush increased the defense budget 26 percent, the largest increase since the Reagan Administration. WHAT HAVE THE LIBERALS DONE?

Bush doubled investments in missile defense systems and will deploy the first ever land and sea-based system to counter mounting missile threats from rogue nations like North Korea and possibly even China and Iran. WHAT HAVE THE LIBERALS DONE?

Bush increased military pay by more than 21 percent over three years, expanded use of targeted pay and bonuses, and improved housing. WHAT HAVE THE LIBERALS DONE?

Bush protected America by creating and then nearly tripling homeland security discretionary funding. WHAT HAVE THE LIBERALS DONE?

Bush secured enactment of the largest Government reorganization in a half-century, merging 22 entities into the Department of Homeland Security. WHAT HAVE THE LIBERALS DONE?

Bush has provided $4.5 billion to State and local governments and hospitals for Bioterrorism preparedness, and secured $5.6 billion for the BioShield Initiative. WHAT HAVE THE LIBERALS DONE?

Bush transformed the FBI into an agency whose primary mission is to prevent terrorist attacks. Then rightfully increased its budget by over 40 percent so that we wouldn’t make the same mistakes made in the years leading up to the 911 attacks. WHAT HAVE THE LIBERALS DONE?

Uh oh! Somebody did their homework!!!! LOL!

2007-09-11 00:56:15 · answer #3 · answered by ? 5 · 4 2

Osama is in hiding in fear of his life, something he had no problem with in the 90s. The Taliban leadership is mostly captured or dead except for a very few. also something they didn't worry about when Clinton was in office.
Its amazing to me that now you are so concerned about Osama and the Taliban when only a few years ago your President couldn't be bothered to even consider them a threat.

2007-09-11 00:55:52 · answer #4 · answered by smsmith500 7 · 3 1

The dems can't even face Fox news,let alone terrorists. The dems are good at primping their hair. You haven't had a tough leader since JFK.

LOL! Oh yea,Clinton did all that with a wave of his cigar.

2007-09-11 00:57:39 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 4 0

Convenient how Osama always releases tapes or videos whenever Bush needs help politically.........Just as it was convenient the anthrax terrorist seemed to target people who might oppose Bush.Then disappeared without a trace........just as the trail went cold at a military base!

2007-09-11 01:06:03 · answer #6 · answered by honestamerican 7 · 0 2

And yet you are still free to rant and haven't yet been attacked by a terrorist! Whats it going to take for you to be a little grateful?

2007-09-11 00:57:49 · answer #7 · answered by Brianne 7 · 3 1

You mean the dems caught him in the 90's. Hmmm.

2007-09-11 00:55:32 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

they are NOT tough on terror. this country had an opportunity to be tough on terror, but instead listed to the lies of GWB and we instead ended up attacking and invading Iraq who had nothing to do with 9-11 nor were they a threat to the U.S.

2007-09-11 00:56:45 · answer #9 · answered by truth seeker 7 · 1 4

they arent tough on war they jus tough at using angry hatefull language

2007-09-11 00:53:55 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 4

fedest.com, questions and answers