I haven't been able to find any sound answers to this question. A lot of conspiracy theorist point to this as proof that the government at the very least had knowledge of 9/11 before it happened. I don't agree and I don't think that that is any kind of "proof" that I would hang a man for. There has to a more logical reason for if he truely was guilty he would go under oath and then lie like I believe Clinton did.
2007-09-10 16:31:55 · 15 answers · asked by noXizTenC 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
9/11 Commission is bullcrap. We wasted valuable money, time, and resources to create some agenda that accomplishes NOTHING.
2007-09-10 16:35:11 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
Clinton's big mistake was allowing himself to be put under oath and got nailed for it.
The Bush administration learned from this mistake and has done everything in its power to avoid being forced to testify under oath.
2007-09-11 00:53:45 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
He had Cheney to come with him to the 9/11commission with a written statement that would not be sworn in , why because they are lying out their teeth , Bought are sorry as whale shi* in the bottom of the ocean . Cheney answered all the question because old brain dead Bush didn't even know where he was at the time. That half wit just sit there grinning and looking around, one of the 9/11 group first name BOB when they walked in got up and walked out because he knew it was useless pile of shi*.
2007-09-10 23:40:12 · answer #3 · answered by Nicki 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Because he probably would have been caught in some lie!Consider when the presidential daily briefing(titled "Bin laden determined to strike inside US") was first brought to light we were told(by the administration) it contained too much sensitive info to be de-classified.Only because of public outrage was it released.Once it was finally de-classified and released only 2 or 3 lines(out of a page and a half) were blacked out!It makes you wonder how many other potentially damaging documents were classified because of political reasons!
2007-09-11 00:11:54 · answer #4 · answered by honestamerican 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Was he called to testify? Was he advised on what happened or did he do everything himself. No advice no help, no counselors.
I think is funny how some people call him an idiot and a chimp then blame him for masterminding a disaster, attacking countries etc. It just goes to show that most loser on here have no idea how a country works.
2007-09-10 23:48:45 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Well if he wasn't a liar, why wouldn't he testify under oath? what would he have to hide? I think he has proved himself to be a big fibber, where are all those weapons of mass destruction that our soldiers have been dying looking for? I would rather trust Clinton any day over Bush.
2007-09-10 23:43:58 · answer #6 · answered by onyx1 5 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Because he is lying about what he knew. Why weren't they able to stop the planes? Bush knew an attack was coming and sat back and did nothing. Then the morons voted him back into office. He didn't protect us and now everyone is saying a Democrat wont be tough enough on terrorists. Bin Laden is still running free, not that I really expected Bush to go after a family friend.
2007-09-10 23:38:13 · answer #7 · answered by oldhag 5 · 5⤊ 2⤋
Because if they put him under oath, they can ask him whatever they like, and he would have to answer or risk committing perjury. If you are in that high of office, the last thing you want to do is put yourself in a situation of being under oath and having to tell the truth about ANYTHING. Look how it worked for Clinton.
2007-09-10 23:38:05 · answer #8 · answered by volleyballchick (cowards block) 7 · 6⤊ 2⤋
Bush can't hide a lie not being under oath. Why would he want to try?
2007-09-10 23:35:10 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
My guess is that he excersised the executive privilege, which uncontested gives him full immunity and therefore does not have to testify even if subpoenaed.
2007-09-11 00:57:19 · answer #10 · answered by The Federalist 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋