English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

http://icasualties.org/oif/

2007-09-10 16:13:47 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

26 answers

Drive out the Bush regime!

2007-09-10 17:03:02 · answer #1 · answered by Iain G 3 · 1 1

He should have been impeached long before now. In fact, he did not win the election and Al Gore should have been president. The popular vote was clear and Florida's ineptitude contributed to the Supreme Court's stupid decision. President Clinton had amassed a 5 trillion dollar surplus and it took King Bush so little time to spend that and to bring us into a world of debt that it will take Mrs. Clinton to bring us out of. Our middle class is suffering, not to mention those in poverty. But, hey the rich are profiting from tax cuts that they don't need. Those would be Mr. Bush and most all of Congress, since they are all millionaires.

As you know, Congress has given themselves a raise every year (except this one, pending a minimum wage increase legislated by Democrats). How in the world could they give themselves raises when in 10 years they ignored the minimum wage of American workers? Not to mention, they get pensions almost equal to their $185,000 salaries.

Break it down to hours worked, Congress makes about $2500 per hour. They take off for months at a time and aren't even required to show up for work. I'd loose my job if I did that.

Impeach Bush? I vote for that. He is not in his office because of the money, because he doesn't need it. He is in it for his name (his father) and appears to have no idea what the American public wants; however he really does. He is adamant in projecting his personal agendas without regard to what is best for the United States of America. He works more for Mexico than he does for the U.S. I have no idea what this stupid man is thinking.

He is not alone. Congress is not doing what we thought they would do in ending a war that really does not exist. You can declare war on a country, but not on a idea. One might think that, "if you leave me alone; I'll leave you alone". There is no amount of troops that go on the front lines and die will make any difference in the politics of another country.

75% of Americans are against this so-called war. 70% of Iraq citizens say that our troops should leave. Does it take a rocket scientist to realize that what we are doing and have done is wrong? Bush should be impeached and then Dick Cheny should be impeached after that.

2007-09-10 16:44:47 · answer #2 · answered by Boomer 5 · 1 1

The Dems are wussies.

At the least Rove, Rumsfeld, Gonzales, Powell, Cheney and Bush (and I think Feinstien) need to be brought up on charges. There wouldn't be a war except for their falsifying of evidence. You can't blame congress because bush falsified the reason for going.

About 1200 contractors have been killed, especially translators. The people fighting are brave the cause is false.

A Pyrrhic victory is a victory with devastating cost to the victor. The phrase is an allusion to King Pyrrhus of Epirus, whose army suffered irreplaceable casualties when he defeated the Romans during the Pyrrhic War at Heraclea in 280 BC and Asculum in 279 BC.



Charges against BUSH:
WHEREAS, President Bush has publicly admitted to ordering the National Security Agency to violate provisions of the 1978 Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, a felony, specifically authorizing the Agency to spy on American citizens without warrant; and

WHEREAS, Evidence suggests that President Bush authorized violation of the Torture Convention of the Geneva Conventions, a treaty regarded a supreme law by the United States Constitution; and

WHEREAS, The Bush Administration has held American citizens and citizens of other nations as prisoners of war without charge or trial; and

WHEREAS, Evidence suggests that the Bush Administration
has manipulated intelligence for the purpose of initiating a war against the sovereign nation of Iraq, resulting in the deaths of large numbers of Iraqi civilians and causing the United States to incur loss of life, diminished security and billions of dollars in unnecessary expenses; and

WHEREAS, The Bush Administration leaked classified
national secrets to further a political agenda, exposing an
unknown number of covert U. S. intelligence agents to potential harm and retribution while simultaneously refusing to
investigate the matter;

2007-09-10 16:20:51 · answer #3 · answered by Village Player 7 · 3 1

These 13 dead in addition to the thousands of others killed and maimed are part of the faceless, hick cannon fodder of America. Don´t kid yourself, America will continue with sports, game shows and boredom shopping and not blink an eye. Just forget impeachment.

2007-09-10 16:38:56 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Local governments can play a major role in the impeachment process. A city or state cannot directly impeach a President. That is done by the US House of Representatives. But individuals, groups or local governments can initiate the impeachment process by sending charges to the Congress for them to act on. Efforts are now underway in several states to initiate impeachment of George Bush. Many cities and counties have already passed resolutions calling for impeachment. Our hope is that these resolutions will encourage Congress to vote for impeachment.

2007-09-10 16:19:05 · answer #5 · answered by P B 3 · 2 3

Look, I hate Bush as much as anybody. But this is a ridiculous argument. In a war, any war, people will die. That's true whether the war is necessary or not, whether it's defensive or offensive, and whether it's for a greater good or not.

The fact that people die in war is no reason to impeach anybody. There are lots of decent reasons to impeach these people. There are lots of reasons to be sad about the people dying. There's just no connection between the two.

2007-09-10 16:18:40 · answer #6 · answered by skip742 6 · 2 3

Why not do some research on what is required to begin an impeachment. If liberals spent a little more time researching our democratic system instead of cooking up conspiracies and flapping their lip... They wouldn't ask so may absurd questions. The president would have to be guilty of a crime in order to be impeached. A fine example would be perjury, such as your liberal hero Clinton was found guilty of...

2007-09-10 16:27:52 · answer #7 · answered by Marco R 4 · 2 3

isn't a snicker in a tragic tragic way .. how people will take your question and straight away accuse you of attacking the squaddies ......are they completely blind as to what that's you have written.... This conflict is Vietnam over back ... solid squaddies demise for a NO solid reason... what grow to be it back ( re Iraq) .. WMD?? or grow to be it drawing near danger ??? or grow to be it a regime exchange?? September11th ( that had no longer something TO DO WITH SADAM) or grow to be all of it in simple terms over oil. venture performed ? how some years later?? My heart is going out to the squaddies and their families and no one i comprehend who's against the conflict ... Hates the squaddies .. all of them have the soldier's superb interest at heart. such assorted individuals i comprehend stay in greater worry of their government that they actually do of a terrorist attack. they're petrified of the rights that they are dropping under the guise of the patriot (sp) act.. they're petrified of the enemies that they have confidence their government is coming up.... Sadam grow to be NO danger to america of a.( no disputing he grow to be to specific communities interior of his very own people) ... yet what number situations have you ever study people writing approximately how plenty safer they experience devoid of sadam... permit's in simple terms say SUCKED IN BIGTIME people.. such assorted of you're allowing yourselves to stay fearfully . a ploy of your government so as which you would be arranged to do what the presidents asks in spite of ability to justify HIS end. Having mentioned ALL THAT .. troops can no longer purely pull out of Iraq.. we instigated the regime exchange ( a regime that DID have stability .. additionally created out ot worry) it may be morally corrupt to go away the harmless unguarded. Peace Keepers are mandatory. you have asked a query which will rile many up .. there is not any ordinary answer to this

2016-11-14 22:02:00 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Our President has forgotten about his people. He has no sympathy or apathy for those who have lost their life or limbs to a war for no reason. He is one thing. An oil man. So is his right hand man Chaney (Halliburton Oil). This is a civil, a religious and oil war. None of those three reasons constitute the right for war. There have been religious warring's going on since Biblical times and no other President has gone to war over it. I am an Army Veteran and proud that I served my country. But I am ashamed of this war. I have always bragged about all my wonderful years of travel and fun and now my son is going in next month. He had a college education payed for by my old GI Bill but he wants to do it on his own. I admire his courage but pray he doesn't die or have to fight for absolutely nothing but greed. God Bless all of soldiers, fallen and still with us!!!

2007-09-10 16:25:05 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

I wish he could be impeach tomorrow because we're real close to 4,000 dead troops that he has murdered and all those innocent Iraq people/ Judgment day he will go so straight to hell right along with all sidekicks .

2007-09-10 16:26:43 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

fedest.com, questions and answers