English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

September 10, 2007
Anti-war activist Cindy Sheehan was arrested Monday in or near the hearing room where Gen. David Petraeus and U.S. Ambassador to Iraq Ryan Crocker are testifying on the situation in Iraq, according to the U.S. Capitol Police.
http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/cindy-sheehan-arrested-in-outside-petraeus-hearing-2007-09-10.html

This is what, the umpteenth time now? As recidivists often do, she swore up and down that she was "retired" and her anti-American war protesting days were behind her. But alas, when it comes down do it, she just can't seem to keep her nose clean.

Repeat offenders such as this hold little chance for rehabilitation. It would be in the public's best interest to lock her away for good.

2007-09-10 16:13:05 · 38 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

38 answers

About as many times as Democrat staffers give tickets to those nutters for access to the hearing room.

Over and over and over again. They even gave them access to the State of the Union address this year.

Anyone ever hear of post-Sept. 11 security????

2007-09-11 09:57:19 · answer #1 · answered by SallyJM 5 · 1 3

According to her rights she may do whatever she feels is necessary to have her right to protest. She can accomplish her goals as many times as she wants by demonstration and protesting and getting arrested if need be.

She can also pay her fines and walk out the door and start all over. I want her to have the same rights as I do. And until she has done something like murder or cause the death of someone, she has all the rights I do and you do.

We can not start just locking people up because we don't like what they are saying!

Perhaps it time you, me and the rest started taking your lead and taking our causes to the street, court rooms, congress!!!!

2007-09-11 07:22:49 · answer #2 · answered by kickinupfunf 6 · 0 0

It's good that SheMan continues to make a fool out of herself. By her continuing to perform Stupid Far Left Wing Tricks, it keeps in the forefront just how disingenuous this lady and her "cause" really is. People point to her being distraught over the loss of her son in Iraq. This is a joke. She gave that kid up when she divorced the father when the kid was little; she didn't want him. Additionally, Ms. SheMan also gave up yet another child in a subsequent divorce. So much for her motherly instincts. SheMan is a disturbed and unstable individual who is craving to find herself, and as long as she continues to be a clueless dupe of the Far Left Hypocrites, she is the best weapon conservatives have against them.

2007-09-10 19:22:33 · answer #3 · answered by maxman71 2 · 1 1

While i defend her right to free speech, Interupting testimony before congress will get you arreseted. If what she truly wanted was free speech, she would have held a press conference outside. On the other hand, i hear a long criminal looks good on a resume when running for office within the DNC......Her son would be ashamed if he could see her now.

2007-09-10 18:08:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

I don't have a problem with her freedom of speech but I do have a problem with her disruptive ways and interferring with things she disagrees with. The point is not her free speech but how many times does she get to continue to break the law.

2007-09-10 16:37:57 · answer #5 · answered by Moose 6 · 1 1

This is America! The Con's haven't taken away our freedom of speech yet!

2007-09-11 14:02:17 · answer #6 · answered by pkvan 4 · 0 0

Since she loves islamofascist terrorists so much she should be sent to Pakistan to be Osama's soul mate. I'm sure that by now he is tired of his pet goat.

2007-09-11 12:03:21 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I don't think her son would be very happy with her behavior. HER family has cut her loose, and it was reported [and com firmed by her] that her son had advised her [before he left] to get on with her life and not be bitter, if he didn't make it back. THIS was his wish.

2007-09-10 18:48:55 · answer #8 · answered by jerry z 6 · 1 0

Who should really be locked away for good? Anti-democratic, despicable fascist thugs who try to deny someone their constitutional right to freedom of protest.
You neo-cons are all closet dictators.

2007-09-10 16:47:04 · answer #9 · answered by Iain G 3 · 3 1

Anti-American War? Have we no freedoms anymore? I pray every day for this Iraq war to end and our young men and women to be returned. Every day!

2007-09-10 16:39:17 · answer #10 · answered by Pamela V 7 · 4 1

fedest.com, questions and answers