dO yOU tHiNk hUMAN bEiNgS aRE iNhERENtLy // NAtURALLy gOOd .. oR EViL? iN a WORLd WiTh nO gOV't oR LAWS, RULEs, && sO oN, WhiCh dO yOU tHiNk WOULd bE MORE LikELy? pEOPLE hELPiNg EACh otHER OUt oR pEOPLE WORkiNg ONLy fOR tHEiR OWN gAiN? My OPiNiON iS tHAt WhiLE WE aLL hOPE tHAt WE COULd hAVE tHE CAPACiTy iN tHAt SitUAtiON tO bE gOOd && tO hELP OtHERS RAtHER tHAN fOCUS ONLy oN pERSONaL gAiN, wE ARE aLL StiLL ESSENtiALLy ANiMALs WhOSe iNStiNCtS WiLL ALWAyS bE "SURViVaL Of tHE FiTTESt", && @ tHE ENd oF tHE DAy, wE aS hUMANs wOULd REALiZE, oR cOME tO tHE CONCLUSiON [[REgARdLESS oF WhEtHER iT's WRONg oR RiGHt]] tHAt bEiNg SELFiSh gEtS yOU fARtHER tHAN hELPiNg OtHERs iN yUR pROCESS. sO, WhAt dO yOU aLL tHiNk??
[[and for those of you ignorant idiots who are going to "answer" this question, not with a relevant opinion, but with a stupid comment on how "annoying" the way i type is :: ShUt tHE EFF uP! do you not have anything better to do than to criticize my typing? get an effin' life.]]
2007-09-10
15:13:17
·
9 answers
·
asked by
♥_mrs.smith
4
in
Arts & Humanities
➔ Philosophy
jENNa H. - iT's gEt nOt GtE && iT's yOU're nOt yOURE. LEARN sOME gRAMMAR, hOE. =]
2007-09-10
15:37:38 ·
update #1
&& iT's dON't nOt dONt. && bECAUSE nOt "CaUSE". tALk aBOUt UNEdUCAtEd. lOl. StUPiD COW. =)
2007-09-10
15:40:34 ·
update #2