The "action" of which you speak would have had to happen in March!
2007-09-10 11:57:46
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ok, everyone pointed that Santa would have to get some action in MARCH... Well, what's the problem? All zoologists know that March-April is the mating season of Santas. Their belly inflates twice it's natural size as a way of attracting the common Bored Housewife.
2007-09-11 06:41:56
·
answer #2
·
answered by Way Out There 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
that makes no sense. If santa was getting in on the action, babies would be being born in September...conceived in December. But nice try.
2007-09-10 18:58:23
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, for a baby to be born in December you'd get pregnant in March. Babies born in September are a different story. My son and I are both December babies. I have none in or around in September.
2007-09-10 18:58:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by DeadHelen 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
don't think Santa's got that much to do with it, but it does
somewhat prove that March really is a good month for
planting.
2007-09-10 19:21:03
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Most people I know seem to have been born in May....which would mean the action happened in August....which would seem to make more sense to me. But, if you know differently, I'm not going to argue with you.
2007-09-10 19:03:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by hello world 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I heard most births were in October!
2007-09-10 18:59:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ummm...that would mean that the babies would be born in September. ....lol...
2007-09-10 18:57:33
·
answer #8
·
answered by Flaming Tresses aka Walkingbymoonlight 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Are they? Is that a fact?!
2007-09-10 19:00:57
·
answer #9
·
answered by ǝsɹnuʎxǝs 6
·
0⤊
0⤋