Whenever I see images of George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Karl Rove, Alberto Gonzales, Condoleezza Rice, Donald Rumsfeld, Paul Wolfowitz, Katherine Harris and other minions of, or apologists for, the corrupt, inept, mendacious and venal Bush dictatorship, I am immediately reminded of this line from John Carpenter’s classic horror movie Halloween: “What is living behind [their] eyes is purely and simply evil.”
2007-09-10
10:50:39
·
24 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Government
Yet in America there is a great reluctance to use the term “evil” when describing the cabal of thugs, hypocrites and war criminals who stole the White House in 2000 and 2004. Although singer/activist Harry Belafonte courageously proclaimed a few years ago that the Bush dictatorship was “possessed of evil,” it wasn’t until recently that others in positions of prominence began to acknowledge the veracity of Belafonte’s statement. A recent episode of the animated comedy Family Guy, for example, showed cartoon portraits of an inanely grinning Bush shaking hands with Saddam Hussein, Osama bin Laden and, ultimately, the “Super Devil” (a being more evil than Satan).
2007-09-10
10:50:54 ·
update #1
Prior to this, most of the statements concerning the inherent evil of the Bush dictatorship came from foreign sources: Russian President Vladimir Putin indirectly suggested that Bush’s foreign policy was analogous to Hitler’s Third Reich; Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez compared Bush to Satan; and the Mayan Indians felt compelled to “spiritually cleanse” a sacred site after Bush visited it earlier this year.
But even though more Americans feel emboldened to criticize the Bush dictatorship, there is still a reluctance to acknowledge and denounce its evil.
2007-09-10
10:51:44 ·
update #2
This reluctance often affects some of the dictatorship’s most outspoken critics: Former American President, and Nobel Laureate, Jimmy Carter recently retreated from his clearly accurate assertion that the Bush dictatorship has been the worst administration in United States history, claiming his words were “careless or misinterpreted.” And syndicated columnist Gwynne Dyer rejected the notion that Bush and/or his minions possessed the evil required to orchestrate the attacks of 9/11, even stressing that Dick Cheney was morally incapable of sanctioning the murders of over three thousand Americans simply to justify the illegal invasion of Iraq.
2007-09-10
10:52:19 ·
update #3
I disagree. While the Bush dictatorship is the domicile for many monsters cloaked in human attire, Cheney is arguably the monster most likely to promote mass murder for the sake of war profiteering. His very character endorses this reality. He possesses the attributes of many mass murderers—a sadist who often kills defenseless animals in “caged hunts” (where they have no means of escape), and a coward who, during the Vietnam war, obtained deferment after deferment to avoid facing an adversary capable of shooting back, only to become a vociferous warmonger once the prospect of being drafted into military service no longer confronted him.
2007-09-10
10:52:50 ·
update #4
But even if one does not subscribe to the theory that character presages deeds, the Bush dictatorship still cannot be absolved from culpability in the 9/11 attacks. In the legal realm, crimes can be committed through act or omission. It is undisputed that Bush, shortly after his coup of 2000, planned to invade Iraq. It is also undisputed that several warnings about the possibility of airline hijackings, some provided by foreign governments, were forwarded to the Bush dictatorship.
2007-09-10
10:53:25 ·
update #5
What most likely occurred was that Bush and his minions were aware of the planned attacks, but underestimated their magnitude, believing any hijacking would be of the “traditional” variety: An American aircraft would be forced to fly to an unplanned destination, followed by a lengthy standoff between the hijackers and the Bush dictatorship. Allowing a hijacking to occur would give Bush the opportunity to blame Iraq, and incite the American media and public into a jingoistic frenzy.
So the question becomes, “Why are Americans so willing to acknowledge the presence of evil when it comes to foreign governments, but so unwilling to acknowledge the presence of evil within their own government?”
2007-09-10
10:53:57 ·
update #6
One explanation may be the “arrogance syndrome.” Americans want to believe they are somehow more “civilized,” and therefore less gullible, than other nations of the world. Unfortunately this belief simply makes them more susceptible to being led into unjust and illegal wars. Also, since many Americans possess short-term memories as selective as the one possessed by Alberto Gonzales (America’s corrupt attorney-general, who recently answered “I cannot recall” over seventy times during his testimony before Congress), they can be duped into supporting such wars time and again.
2007-09-10
10:54:33 ·
update #7
Although most corporate-controlled media now refer to the illegal invasion of Iraq as an “unpopular war,” just a few years ago these same media were salivating at the ratings and profit potential this war would bring. Reporters and entertainers who criticized, or even questioned, the motives for war or other policies of George W. Bush were fired from their jobs and oftentimes blacklisted. Pro-war rallies drew record numbers of people, and these rallies frequently treated war criminals like Bush, Cheney and Rumsfeld as deities.
2007-09-10
10:55:08 ·
update #8
Another reason why evil is rarely acknowledged in America is simply because too many powerful people profit from it. Sadly, this has been the case throughout history.
A recent movie, Amazing Grace, recounted how British politician and abolitionist William Wilberforce often invoked the tenets of Christianity during his campaign against the slave trade in the early 1800s. This compelled many so-called Christians to embrace the film as a paradigm of how good can triumph over evil.
2007-09-10
10:55:41 ·
update #9
Forgotten in this zeal, however, is the sad reality that many Americans used (and in the case of racism continue to use) the Christian faith to justify bigotry and slavery. American abolitionist Frederick Douglass, in his book The Life of an American Slave, describes how a preacher/slaveholder often justified the whipping of his slaves by stating, “He who honors his master must wear his stripes.”
2007-09-10
10:56:20 ·
update #10
Today it is America’s military-industrial complex that profits from economic slavery and the exploitation of the poor and middle-class, who fight and die in wars waged by the rich and powerful. And as long as those in power can reward their cronies with lucrative rebuilding contracts, as long as war can be used to divert attention from government criminality and corruption (as demonstrated by the father of George W. Bush, who invaded Panama to divert attention from the “Savings and Loan” scandal that cost taxpayers billions of dollars), and as long as war can be used to increase the ratings and profit potential of the corrupt corporate-controlled media there will be little incentive to denounce evil in America.
2007-09-10
10:57:02 ·
update #11
A third reason for the failure of Americans to acknowledge evil in their own country is the uncanny ability of human beings to rationalize anything. When I was in law practice, I often noticed that there was little difference between “law breakers” and “law makers.” Both demonstrated an enormous capacity to rationalize their actions, no matter how much those actions defied morality or commonsense.
2007-09-10
10:57:52 ·
update #12
The incentive to rationalize is particularly prominent in today’s “sound bite” culture. Corporate-controlled media incessantly select the most “controversial” statements for repeated airplay, often taking them out of context. Meanwhile complex topics, if they are covered at all, are covered only superficially; therefore laypeople often do not have the political or historical background necessary to develop well-informed viewpoints, and thus erect their opinions on tenuous foundations that are frequently devoid of facts.
2007-09-10
10:58:32 ·
update #13
For example, a recent editorial on the CNN website argued that Americans would be remiss if they failed to honestly debate Texas Congressman Ron Paul’s contention that American foreign policy, particularly its proclivity to dominate or overthrow foreign governments for the sake of corporate profits, played a role in the build-up to the 9/11 attacks.
But it is unlikely that such a debate will ever transpire, particularly since former New York Mayor turned presidential candidate Rudy Giuliani has already demonstrated that he will continue to exploit the emotions surrounding 9/11 for his own self-aggrandizement, just as he has opportunistically done in the past.
2007-09-10
10:59:15 ·
update #14
The final explanation for why the existence of evil in America is often ignored is because the terms “good and evil” often take one into the realm of religion. When science and logic fails, faith often prevails.
But faith can be a positive force or negative force. Since it cannot be disproved, a person does not require logic or science to acquire faith. But without such logic or science, people can often be deceived into believing concepts that have no factual basis at all. Hating another person because of his/her skin color, for example, is as illogical as hating one flower because it’s red and loving another because it’s yellow, particularly since neither possessed the ability to choose what color it would be. Yet racism is alive and well in America.
2007-09-10
10:59:57 ·
update #15
This is why charlatans often exploit the faith of others. If a situation has a positive outcome, they can claim it was because of the “strength of their faith,” and if a situation has a negative outcome, they can claim it was because their followers “didn’t believe deeply enough.”
It was this type of faith that made many Americans embrace the lies of the Bush dictatorship, naively believing that Iraq possessed “weapons of mass destruction,” that Saddam Hussein was involved in the 9/11 attacks, and that war against Iraq would only be used as “a last resort.”
2007-09-10
11:00:42 ·
update #16
This exploitation of faith has been the modus operandi of the Bush dictatorship and its apologists—strategically designed to conceal their ineptitude, arrogance, dishonesty and evil. It has been so effective that many so-called “Christian” colleges and universities have invited members and supporters of the Bush dictatorship, including Bush himself, to be guest or commencement speakers.
Since I began this essay with a quotation from a movie, I will end it with one as well. In Bryan Singer’s remarkable film The Usual Suspects, a character named Verbal Kint remarks, “The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing the world he didn’t exist.” Sadly, this trick will continue to be effective as long as Americans refuse to acknowledge that their nation is being controlled by people who are “purely and simply evil.”
2007-09-10
11:01:20 ·
update #17
i agree w/ you, they are evil. And taking us down with them. Unfortunately having money and power in small numbers outweighs being broke and starving in large, alarming numbers. They have the power to pass legislation, control our minimum wage, cancel welfare reform, merge w/ mexico, all without ever knowing what it's like to watch illegal immigrants get your job AND your foodstamps. And then, if you want to get into college, WHOA watch out, you better be wealthy from birth or learn about automatic weapons. There are good and intelligent people in the US you just can't see them due to all the theatrics.
2007-09-10 11:06:03
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Oh don't be such a frickin emo. You have some valid points but you're being overly dramatic. At the end of the day the Bush administration loves America and is defending it the only way they know how. That's not to say that they're completely inept at doing it and it's very sad that the CIA, FBI and the government don't work together well and end up blaming eachother when things go wrong i.e 9/11. Your attitude is pretty damaging really. Those men aren't evil. Just misguided.
2007-09-10 10:59:32
·
answer #2
·
answered by damo_mc_legend 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
Oh, put a sock in it. That was not a coup in 2000, for one thing, and while the administration is incompetent and political, it is hardly evil.
The responsibility for our current shortcomings rests with all of us. We reacted to the attacks of 9/11/01 with more spirit than wisdom. We rallied around our leaders, who turned out to be unusually weak at a most inopportune time. I'm not sure that under similar circumstances anyone else in office would have done vastly better.
Believe it or not, everyone is doing his best.
2007-09-10 11:00:53
·
answer #3
·
answered by 2n2222 6
·
0⤊
2⤋
i'm valuable there are various evils in usa. Greed, money and skill are the suitable elixir for issues that may basically carry misery. Is Bush evil? perhaps, yet he isn't the only one that has been sucked into the insanity. it fairly is a equivalent risk affliction . you're usually judged by way of those you % to entice close around with. i think of of him greater like promoting his soul to placed on the crown.i think he become a pawn in a plan that become hatched long in the previous he ran for President. there's a company (PNAC)it fairly is made out of a brilliant form of people who coincidentally, some made up a brilliant portion of his closest cabinet participants. that they had curiously tried to persuade different Presidents to invade Iraq, Bush a million did for about a minutes, yet had experience sufficient to drag out in the previous it grew to become a entire failure. Bush 2 looks to have been the gullible one. He needed it undesirable sufficient to lie and use government orders to override Congress to declare conflict on Iraq.His legacy will stay long into the destiny, by way of fact it is going to take some years to triumph over the monetary drain Bush has compelled upon us. It become no longer sufficient to combat in Afghanistan, and now in the previous he leaves will he additionally attempt to occupy Iran and North Korea? rather of turning into king, he has become the jester.
2016-10-19 23:55:11
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Lets face it, the truth to all this is that in every form of government there is good and evil. There is no perfect government, and even if there was, its all up to how the people in positions power dictate everything which history shows us will never be perfect. So I would say yes, there is some evil in american politics, but also lots of good.
2007-09-10 11:00:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by J 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
There is no such thing as evil. The concept of evil is a human perception. It isn't a force of nature or some kind of supernatural power. It's something humans made up as a way to classify objectionable behavior.
2007-09-10 11:00:10
·
answer #6
·
answered by skullklipz 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
Yes
2007-09-10 10:57:11
·
answer #7
·
answered by Kacy H 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
Nice rant, way to use family guy as a factual political reference. Oh and giving props to Putin (Ex KGB) from Russia as a great leader even though he has destroyed freedom of press. Thats the icing on the cake.
2007-09-10 10:54:47
·
answer #8
·
answered by Relax Guy 5
·
1⤊
2⤋
Yes. Evil is everywhere since we got kicked out of the Garden of Earthly Delights.
2007-09-10 10:55:51
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Your question has a few machanical errors.
If you think that American politicans are evil, then you obviously don't pay attention to the other countries that do have REAL evil ruling over them. I'm not saying that we are perfect; I'm just saying that we're NOT evil.
2007-09-10 10:59:31
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋