2007-09-10 10:18:17 · 14 answers · asked by done 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Bill Maher stated this on Sept 7th...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TJRetQUTEWA
starts at 2:30
2007-09-10 10:37:48 · update #1
New Twist In Saga Over ‘Petraeus Report’: There Will Be No Report
http://thinkprogress.org/2007/09/07/no-petraeus-report/
2007-09-10 10:54:30 · update #2
because he is speaking it.
2007-09-10 10:21:09 · answer #1 · answered by Lily Iris 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
The white house knows that bush has very little credibility with the American people. There fore if they have Petraeus give the report they think more people will believe it. To me, that shows how much of a coward bush actually is. Remember,he hid from the Viet Nam war, as did cheney. To put Petreaus in that situation was an act of cowardice on bushes part. He got us into this war, he should face the American people, not send a subordinate to do his dirty work. I think Petreaus is a good soldier & like a good soldier he will obey an order from his commander. Too bad his commander is bush!
2007-09-11 02:27:10 · answer #2 · answered by peepers98 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Probably because he is answering questions during the House investigation, along with the Ambassador, and the administration is not answering them. However, I have no doubt that they have been told what to say and are laying the groundwork for staying in Iraq. Petreaus is fully coached! We are never going to get the full story or truth from Bush, and this has become more evident with the investigation. Congress must use their best judgment and they should listen to the American People who have every right to speak their mind!
2007-09-10 10:41:18 · answer #3 · answered by ArRo 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
each and everything because of the fact the report on the suspected WMD, that have been shown to be untrue and subsequently introduced approximately the invasion of Iraq, is the fruit of a toxic tree. as quickly as a lie is advised no longer something yet honesty can exchange the direction. Justifying a "fantasy" can in no way be the reality.
2016-11-14 21:21:02 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The White House wants to make the report look like it was based on "Expert" Military research and opinion.
2007-09-10 10:24:07 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Writing is not the only way to report.He reports to the white house and they write it.Also,last time I checked,General Petraeus is the one reporting to congress,not the White House.That's why its called the Petraeus report.
2007-09-10 10:30:05 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
The General wrote the report and there is no evidence for any other conclusion.
If you are saying he didn't write it then you are inferring that he is lying and I would like to see you prove that allegation.
2007-09-11 09:25:22 · answer #7 · answered by Randy 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Because nobody believes anything the White House says anymore?
2007-09-10 10:21:39 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 1⤋
he writes it, then the WH edits, and then he speaks it. He was picked for the job because he thinks like the neocons that picked him.
2007-09-10 10:32:28 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Blah blah blah...Is anyone surprised that the anti-war nuts are trying to say this?
--Ah, just another conspiracy theory for the alarmingly inept.
2007-09-10 10:31:39 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
To full American people.
2007-09-10 10:36:22 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋