His manifest against the west and capitalism and democracy sounded like it came straight out of berkely, which is pretty much maxist/leninist dribble...is OBL a useful idiot now too?? LMAO...we need his head on a stick though.
2007-09-10 10:09:45 · 7 answers · asked by Steelhead 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Donnie...asking a different question rather than answering the one I posed will qualify you as a typical lib obsfuscator, but will also get you an F in my debate class. Answer the question posed dude...lol
2007-09-10 10:23:57 · update #1
i seem to have struck a nerve here...the libs no it was their talking points and I guess it makes them kinda uncomfortable...lol...great company libs, now u got obl in your camp...great!!
2007-09-10 10:25:58 · update #2
Wow, those intelligent, glib, quick-witted Libs are really letting you have it with both barrels, aren't they?
Dude, you got 'em! This speech could have been written by the DNC. In fact, I am quite certain it was not written by Bin Laden. Compare it with his much more meandering style in previous messages. I think Bin Laden is largely incapacitated, and he is reading a script written for him by his aides.
Democrats should be ashamed that it took a terrorist to reveal how sick and twisted the Democratic platform has become. Imagine if Stalin, Pol Pot, Idi Amin, or Hitler had written a similar endorsement of typical Democrat talking points. Imagine the headlines: "Reich Chancellor Adolf Hitler Heartily Endorses Barack Obama for President". That's type of PR is almost as good as when in the late 1930s, Volkswagen had a print ad campaign showing their cars in front of Nazi Headquarters.
So Democrats, besides being the party endorsed by welfare mommas, drug addicts, clueless college kids, the lazy and the desperate, you can now add Bin Laden to your stellar list of supporters.
Excuse me while I circle the '08 Elections date on my calendar. I'm going to be celebrating....... again.
2007-09-10 11:32:24 · answer #1 · answered by pachl@sbcglobal.net 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
FLIP
"The most important thing is for us to find Osama bin Laden. It is our number one priority and we will not rest until we find him." G.W. Bush, 9/13/01
Washington Post, 9/17/01, UPI: Bush said he wants accused terrorist leader Osama bin Laden "dead or alive.” “I want justice...There's an old poster out West, as I recall, that said, 'Wanted: Dead or Alive,'"- G.W. Bush, 9/17/01, UPI
AP, 12/14/01: President Bush pledged anew Friday that Osama bin Laden will be taken "dead or alive."
FLOP:
Capturing OBL no longer a priority:
G.W. Bush, 3/13/02: I don't know where Bin Laden is. I have no idea and really don't care. It's not that important. It's not our priority."
2007-09-10 17:19:01 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
First of all, Brainiac, it's "drivel", not "dribble".
Second, why does Bush no longer consider capturing Bin Laden a priority?
2007-09-10 17:22:13 · answer #3 · answered by celticexpress 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
American liberals speak Arabic now? Wow they've really gotten educated in the past 4 years haven't they?
2007-09-10 17:33:27 · answer #4 · answered by Lily Iris 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, I'm sure you weren't the only one. Of course, I wouldn't be in a rush to identify myself with idiots, but if you want to, go ahead.
2007-09-10 17:23:56 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
If you looked closley at the video tape...in the background you could see the shadows of Howard Dean and George Soros feeding him his talking points.
2007-09-10 17:16:46 · answer #6 · answered by I Laugh At Morons 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
anyway... are you finished with your rant?
2007-09-10 17:16:36 · answer #7 · answered by Agent 99 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋