Why does bin laden support the Democrats' agenda to withdraw the American troops from Iraq?

Answer 1

Because he knows like all the Terrorist that If America has a Democrat in charge it will make it easy for them to attack America That is also why Terrorist groups are funding the Liberal party

Answer 2

First, you need to learn how not to compare apples to oranges...It does not take a brain surgeon to see the flaw in your logic.

75 percent of americans support withdraw from iraq. A large percent of those are republicans too.
Unless you are wanting to claim that all of those 75 percent are democrats, (if that were the case, we would not of had a republican president, nor would there be any republicans in office.)

So, why do so many republicans support Bin Laden's agenda to withdraw from iraq? Why do so many republicans share the same agenda with democrats?

Could it be that the two are not related. I support withdraw from iraq for many reasons.
First, we did not have the proper authority to be there in the first place. Congress never did sign a declaration of war, iraq instead is a 'military action' that according to the constitution is an unconstitutional war.

Second, I do not feel that america has the authority to disregard another country's soverignty, and ignore that country's right to rule themselves. We have our own problems here at home, and do not need to sacrifice our children's financial future so a group of men can stuff their wallets.

I do not approve of american troops carrying out what in essesnce is genocide against another country, or a group of people within that country. Death counts are already estimated to have reached almost 1 million iraq citizens.
http://www.iraqanalysis.org/mortality/

This is NOT A PARTISAN issue. This is an AMERICAN issue. Ron Paul and other REPUBLICANS also support withdraw from iraq. For numerous VALID reasons, that have NOTHING to do with Bin Laden....

Please, before you ask any more questions that show your ignorance of facts, read a book, turn off fox news, turn off the talk radio, educate yourself, and make up your own mind. Without someone else telling you what to think.

Answer 3

Just as every human being on the planet (and some sub-humans) opposed our going there in the first place, every human being on the planet (and some sub-humans, too) think we should get out.

You might as well ask "Why does Bin Laden breathe the same kind of oxygen as the Democrats?"

Although Bin Laden publicly says he wants us to leave, he's probably fine with our continuing, since, the more terrorism WE engage in, the sooner the rest of the world will bring us down.

Answer 4

He doesn't. The reason for the 9/11 attacks was to get the US to invade a Middle Eastern country to incite a holy war between Islam and the west. Bush is doing his best to make bin laden's dream a reality.

Answer 5

hehehe! righto. how strange that a Muslim extremist would want an occupying force of infidels out of a Muslim country.
the Dems, the Iraqi People and some 70% of the American citizenry must be in cahoots with Osama since they all agree that the occupation of Iraq is a big frigging mess and US troops should be withdrawn.

neoCON talking points help the American sheeple herd feel secure in their chosen ignorance.

Answer 6

Um, maybe because that's the last thing he wanted in the first place? And maybe because he's been fighting us in order to get it to happen? We've been meddling in middle eastern countries for a long time now, and it's been building up a lot of hatred. So, once we're out, and all that hatred has no basis for the future, where's the reason for terrorist attacks? I know what you're going to say: Islamic radicals, right? How many Islamic radical attacks do you remember there being on the U.S. and how many were based off that reason alone? If the answer is 0, you're right!

Answer 7

U.S. presence in any Islamic country is an offense to Bin Laden. He supported Bush when we withdrew our Military prescence from Saudi Arabia.

We are our own worst enemy when we attack each other like that. Stop playing partisan BS games and grow up!

Answer 8

He wants the attention

The Democrats will make him # 1 Priority AGAIN

FLIP
"The most important thing is for us to find Osama bin Laden. It is our number one priority and we will not rest until we find him." G.W. Bush, 9/13/01
Washington Post, 9/17/01, UPI: Bush said he wants accused terrorist leader Osama bin Laden "dead or alive.” “I want justice...There's an old poster out West, as I recall, that said, 'Wanted: Dead or Alive,'"- G.W. Bush, 9/17/01, UPI
AP, 12/14/01: President Bush pledged anew Friday that Osama bin Laden will be taken "dead or alive."

FLOP:
Capturing OBL no longer a priority:
G.W. Bush, 3/13/02: I don't know where Bin Laden is. I have no idea and really don't care. It's not that important. It's not our priority."

Answer 9

*
Just like the democrats are , OBL is completely invested in America's failure, defeat, and surrender in the war against terror. Just like OBL the democrats are completely invested in the ultimate destruction of all that has made America the greatest success in the history of the world.

Unlike OBL the democrats may just win and be the destruction of all we value.

*

Answer 10

Apparently even the most violently insane man on the planet can still tell how worthless and futile that the war in Iraq is.

Answer 11

The terrorists arrested in Germany had a deadline for their attack on Ramstein Air Base and the Frankfurt airport, given to them by their al-Qaeda masters: September 15th. Why that date, rather than the more obvious 9/11 anniversary? AQ has more current politics in mind:

Three suspected Islamist militants who were planning to attack U.S. installations in Germany had orders to act by Sept. 15 and knew police were hot on their trail before their arrest, a magazine said on Saturday.
The plan was foiled on Tuesday when police arrested two German converts to Islam and a Turk in the biggest German police operation in 30 years.

According to surveillance details published in Der Spiegel magazine, the men had been given a two-week deadline for their planned strikes in a late August call from northern Pakistan that was monitored by German police.


Congress set a deadline on September 15th as well -- the due date for a progress report on the Iraq War from President Bush. AQ wanted to replicate the Tet offensive, only not in Iraq but in Europe. A devastating attack before Bush delivered his report would tend to discredit the forward strategy pursued by the administration since the 9/11 attacks.

Why attack Europe? Osama wants the US out of the Middle East, especially Iraq and Afghanistan. If he could convince the American critics of the administration that the forward strategy had failed, Osama thinks he could gain enough leverage over Bush to force a withdrawal of troops in Iraq, if not Afghanistan. He wants to hit behind our lines to push us into a retreat from the real fronts against AQ in Iraq and Afghanistan.

His video message was timed to deliver that purpose. His announcement would have immediately preceded the attacks in Germany and Denmark, emphasizing AQ's ability to strike anywhere in the world. And it probably would have had the effect Osama intended, had it worked; there is little doubt that war critics would have redoubled their effort to discredit the forward strategy and force Bush to pull out of Iraq.

Ask yourselves this: why does Osama want to push us out of the Middle East, especially Iraq and Afghanistan? It's not because we're losing in either theater. If we were losing, he'd be happy to beat American military forces for as long as we stuck around. He wants us out because he's losing -- and he tried to hit Germany and Denmark because he can't beat the American military in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Or perhaps people think it's a coincidence that Osama finally reappeared after the surge pushed AQI all the way to the Syrian border?