i think well doesn't mean every one took steroids the only way i believe they did is when i see evidence
2007-09-10 12:04:06
·
answer #1
·
answered by Janet ♥(YFFL) 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I personally believe that 90%+ of the players who supposedly did roids have done them. The whole innocent until proven guilty thing is a bunch of crap. Why is it that Canseco and Grimsley can name all these players, and more players can be named in leaks and yet no one is suspended or found guilty of using them? Its because athletes can and will do everything in their power to protect their names, and because most of the modern performance enhancers are not detectable. As a fan, the only protection we have against these low lifes is our own judgement, because MLB and the law can't do anything against them. If you think they're guilty, most likely you have probable cause to think that way and are probably right. To all the supporters of the whole innocent until proven guilty how many of you really believe OJ is innocent?
2007-09-10 10:20:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No doubt that at least one person on that list(other than jay gibbons)is a roid user, i'll let u guess who that is.
2007-09-10 09:01:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by Tribe of benjamin 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Honestly man, I couldnt care less anymore. So much of it has become heresay at this point. You dont know who did what, who didnt do this or that. It's become tiresome just hearing about it and reading about it.
At this point, I couldnt care less anymore who took steroids and who didnt. I think if you're guilty and you're caught, no suspension, no second chance, you're banned from the game. Thats the only way they're gonna get through to these guys.
2007-09-10 09:46:52
·
answer #4
·
answered by J-Far 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
Never pre judge anyone until all the facts are out. If just one of the above names you have never used drugs it is better to believe that none used drugs than to convict them all. There is plenty of time to have all of this sort out and every player should be given the benefit of the doubt until evidence shows otherwise.
2007-09-10 09:08:13
·
answer #5
·
answered by Frizzer 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
Jason Grimsey was later quoted as saying that he had said Roger Clemens and Andy Pettitte were two guys who did NOT use steroids or HGH.
2007-09-10 09:21:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by GoYankees353 3
·
1⤊
3⤋
HGH (human growth hormone) is not roids.
Many Athletes used HGH to recover from injury or from surgery in the early part of the decade. Look up Rick Ankiel. He used HGH for almost a year after his surgery in 2004 to help his recovery, and it was very well documented. Bonds is said to have used HGH to recover from surgery in 2005 and countless other have used and still use HGH. It is a banned substance since 2005, but it is virtually undetectable by todays testing measures.
2007-09-10 09:13:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by amgolf27 3
·
0⤊
4⤋
BRIAN ROBERTS????? NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO
HE'S SO GORGEGOUS THOUGH!!!!
Okay, okay, sorry about that. They all should serve a suspension then, if proven guilty.
OR
They should be INVESTIGATED....Oooohh....BE SCARED!!!!!!!
I can't believe baseball is starting to actually do something about steroids and HGH. It's about time they found all the juicers
2007-09-10 09:05:59
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
4⤋