Committee on Foreign Relations?

Question

The CFR (not to be confused with the Senate committee) is the American branch of a society which originated in England and believes national boundries should be obliterated and one-world rule established. They are orchestrating the NAU and open border movement here in America. I would like your opinions of this and what you think it means for your own future.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vo5CZvD3-QM

Aren't we harsh! Funny that you're the authority who chastises people for not researching, because the following quote came off their website -- guess THEY know what they're about!

"To build on the advances of the past decade and to craft an agenda for the future, we propose the creation by 2010 of a community to enhance security, prosperity, and opportunity for all North Americans. To that end, we propose a community based on the premise that each member benefits from its neighbor’s success and is diminished by its problems. The boundaries of the community would be defined by a common external tariff and an outer security perimeter. Within this area, the movement of people and products would be legal, orderly, and safe. The overarching goal is to guarantee a free, safe, just, and prosperous North America." I
In other words, a North American Union.

http://www.cfr.org/content/publications/attachments/NorthAmerica_TF_eng.pdf

"PASTOR: Well, there is a lot of opposition to trade right now, and the debate on CAFTA is an example of it. I think that it’s not very well understood, that really, what you’re talking about when you create a free-trade area is you’re enlarging competition. And enlarged competition, as we know in the greatest single market in the world, the United States, leads to a lot of winners and losers; a lot of changes very quickly.
And the problem is that the losers have a greater incentive to protest than the winners, who believe that their success is due to their own genius. And so you need to build institutional mechanisms to compensate for that kind of thing. You can do it, to a certain extent within the United States, but I think the real point about the North American investment fund is precisely to lift all of Mexico and to close the development gap between Mexico and its two northern neighbors."

http://www.cfr.org/publication/8138/building_a_north_american_community.html

Aren't we harsh, govnathan! Funny that you're the authority who chastises people for not researching, because the following quote came off their website -- guess THEY know what they're about!

"To build on the advances of the past decade and to craft an agenda for the future, we propose the creation by 2010 of a community to enhance security, prosperity, and opportunity for all North Americans. To that end, we propose a community based on the premise that each member benefits from its neighbor’s success and is diminished by its problems. The boundaries of the community would be defined by a common external tariff and an outer security perimeter. Within this area, the movement of people and products would be legal, orderly, and safe. The overarching goal is to guarantee a free, safe, just, and prosperous North America." I
In other words, a North American Union.

http://www.cfr.org/content/publications/attachments/NorthAmerica_TF_eng.pdf

Answer 1

The less "foreign relations" we have the better!
How many countries are scamming "foreign aid" out of us now?
Anyone know?

Answer 2

My opinion is that you either need to stop spouting what you know is propaganda or do some research before posting outlandish comments.

First, the SENATE Committee on Foreign Relations is hardly a society set on the abolition of national boundaries. It is a standing Committee in the Senate made up of ELECTED officials that generally oversees finances with other countries and nominates potential diplomats.

Now, you may be talking about the COUNCIL on foreign relations, but that's a different issue. The council on foreign affairs is little more than a think tank. They do what all think tanks do, take a bunch of information and put out a slew of opinions on what they think is right. incidentally, they also publish one of the BEST foreign affairs journals in the world.

I'm sure many of the members support open boarders, stronger world government, but as your video so aptly described many of teh members do not. The primary goal of the organization is to increase awareness of foreign policy awareness. The only thing Ron Paul is proving is that he is the only politition not intelligent enough to consult the premier think tank on foreign relations.