Schaub will be greatness in human form.
2007-09-10 06:15:43
·
answer #1
·
answered by Southpaw 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
It's Tony Romo. He has one of the top three or four receivers in the land in TO. He might get Terry Glenn back, who is another frontline receiver and could be No. 1 on another team. Then Patrick Crayton is really coming on, as you saw last night. Jason Witten is a better tight end than anyone not named Antonio Gates, Jeremy Shockey or Tony Gonzales. And that Cowboys offensive line is pretty good. Probably the best in the NFC East and maybe in all the NFC.
Andre Johnson is pretty good, but he's not TO. Jones, mathis and walter are OK, but they definitely don't compete with the dallas receivers when Glenn is healthy. And even without Glenn, I think the Cowboys' receivers get the edge.
And I think you are wrong not to include the RBs. A QB without a running game is a sitting duck.
2007-09-10 06:25:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by Blade_III 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
I have to go with Romo.
The guy has more than just pocket sense...he also has the ability to scramble and make something happen...perhaps even score a Running TD on his own...like he did.
He has the "It" factor, what I like to consider natural leadership...anyone who can develop a bond and football friendship with Mr. Owens and ultimately get him to be an assett for the team has got to have what they call the "It" factor.
Now on the flip side what Schaub has going for him is a team that has done it right...the Texans have one of the toughest Defenses in the NFL and this will allow Schaub to learn and win games when he is not at this best.
No doubt the Texans/Cowboys rivalry in Texas is growing, but for now, I have to give the edge to Romo and company.
2007-09-10 06:20:01
·
answer #3
·
answered by warequalspeace 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
I dont know, even though my answer will be bias because I hate the Cowboys, I will say that I would feel more comfortable with Matt Schaub mainly because Romo doesnt have the poise that Matt has, and tends to be spastic and erratic at times, and does always make good mental decisions or stay focused.
2007-09-10 06:05:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by Dizzy D 1
·
1⤊
0⤋
Schaub is lots extra suitable it isnt even close yeah Romo has extra suitable arm strenght extra suitable mobility and he gets injured much less yet Schaub is extra precise his dicision making is extra suitable his playaction bypass is the terrific ib the NFL Schaub is likewise extra consistent. ill take a QB with extra suitable accuracy and selection making over arm potential and mobility.
2016-12-16 16:31:13
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Thats a hard question.I guess I would have to say Schaub.2-0, you expect that from Dallas not from the Texans.Look back at last year, would you think Houston would start 2-0?
2007-09-17 23:34:08
·
answer #6
·
answered by cliffpitt 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No RBs?? You mean no QBs.
Give me Andre Johnson over Terrell "King Kleenex" Owens any day, and someday TE Owen Daniels could be as good as Witten. But the Dallas defense and O-line is superior.
2007-09-10 06:13:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by Your Uncle Dodge! 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
The Texans have found their future in QB Matt Schaub.
2007-09-10 06:04:56
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
actually the cowboys have some rbs in Julius Jones and Marion Barber
2007-09-10 06:06:34
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
one word !! accuracy romo has pinpoint accuracy and i haven't seen shaub enough to evaluate
2007-09-17 14:58:24
·
answer #10
·
answered by handymanscott2005 1
·
0⤊
0⤋