English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Do mainstream democrats feel comfortable being in a party that has taken so much money from people like George Soros that he announced last November that he OWNED the democratic party. People like Soros who have taken out an ad in the New York Times where they called a hero General Betrayus. People who will have a debate in a gay forum, a hispanic forum, and a Internet forum but will obey orders and not appear on the Fox News Channel. People will announce a week ahead of time that the contents of the Petraeus Report will not be accepted no matter what he says. People whose rhetoric perfectly matches the words of Osama Bin Laden's latest video tape. Can you really feel comfortable with your position and bedmates? I would really like to know why you accept the Democratic party as it is.

2007-09-10 05:49:38 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

Well that was quick, 5 minutes for nasty answers.

How can you sleep knowing what you are doing to your childrens future?

Divided country? Go back about 12 years for that.

2007-09-10 06:03:47 · update #1

Tell me what is the alternative?

I said the New York Times! No, I'm not going to waste my time looking for a link. I'm right about the paper yesterday and lends credibility to what Soros said the day after the election in 2006 (thats a clue).

2007-09-10 06:05:55 · update #2

The dems pay lip service to women's rights? Is that all you want? Monica under the desk playing lip service and the NOW remaining silent. You must be an easy date. Of course you could research the number of women in the Bush administration that have high office.

2007-09-10 06:07:49 · update #3

Of course you have to indict Bill Clinton for ignoring the March 1993 wake up call to terrorism and then sleeping on it until 2001. Where was the action for the Cole, the embassies, the towers in Riyadh, etc...
Tell me what would you have said if George Bush had attacked Afghanistan the day after he took office. Of course, the military was still unprepared from 8 years of Clinton but would you have supported Bush then? Tell us the truth?

2007-09-10 06:11:51 · update #4

blind where do you go to get the executive experience for work in the federal government at the executive level? I can think of three places; government, business, and the military. So what is your problem with people from business?

2007-09-10 07:17:57 · update #5

Well Catrionn I didn't know you bruised so easy. You made a comment and I think you are totally wrong and said so. You would have probably said that it isn't true or why do you say that. So I told you why I believe that. Too bad you're so sensitive to have a give and take. Did I just hurt your feelings again?

2007-09-11 16:23:22 · update #6

16 answers

Soros is a hideous man who would eat his young if it meant furthering his marxist grip on the DNC.

Seeing democrating candidates sucking up to him for $$$ looks like a nest of hungry birds stretching thier necks to the limit to receive a morsel from mom.

But... go against him and he will try to sink your political career faster than you can say " Joe Leiberman"
Joe was smarter than Soros... when his party turned against him at the bequest of Soros for his support of the war, Leiberman went Independant and BEOTCH SLAPPED Soros and his band of minions!

Way to go Joe!

2007-09-10 06:02:12 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

I don't blindly accept the democratic party, because I feel that anyone who follows a party with out following the policies is an ignorant participant of a failing democracy.

However, I do stand more with the democratic party than the republican, and I feel your statements of "party ownership" are biased by not criticizing both parties.

A couple examples from the the presidential cabinet:
Dick Cheney, former CEO of Haliburton
Condoleezza Rice, Chevron

Its one thing to have money donated by a individual with specific interests, and another to have leaders with clear ties to corporations with economic interests at stake.

However, rather than criticize, why don't we have a election system that will limit the influence of people like George Soros?

2007-09-10 06:06:49 · answer #2 · answered by blindcuriosity 2 · 2 1

At one time, Hillary replaced right into a Republican. invoice Clinton replaced into continually a Democrat so while Hillary married him, or in the past they have been married, she grew to become to the Democratic social gathering. the two one among them have been from families that weren't wealthy. i've got self belief that the two are actual Democrats & Hillary has had an prolonged time prefer to shelter well being care, rather for babies. i've got self belief that the courtroom circumstances are being extra against them to deliver her down, no longer by way of fact she will ever be convicted of something!

2016-10-18 13:19:59 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Why do you buy into the GOP lines so much?You seem to forget how when Bill Clinton went on Fox News Sunday he was attacked for not doing enough before leaving office to combat terrorism.When realistically the Bush administration IGNORED terrorism UNTIL 9/11!!!! If anything Bush should have been tried for treason for being derelict in his duty for ignoring terrorism until 9/11!

2007-09-10 06:01:22 · answer #4 · answered by honestamerican 7 · 2 2

I'm pretty sick of this fighting dem vs rep, they should both go away. Its obvious to me a Grass root movement needs to start up that isn't influenced by big corporate money. Both parties are corrupt and frankly happy to see us all fighting with each other because it distracts all Americans from how corrupt our government is. The green party s OK but Americans are too chicken to stand up. Are you ready!

2007-09-10 06:01:21 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

I'm neither Democrat or Republican, but I would certainly not favor anyone who appears on Fox "News" or any of the other conservative-biased media "shows". I will not accept the Petraeus Report because I'm intelligent enough to know that it's rigged to deliver the message our insane Commander-In-Chief wants delivered (unless Petraeus intends to commit political suicide). I would agree with much of binLaden's message, knowing that the U.S.A. has tarnished its image as a global peacekeeper and world leader, and - instead - has become a war-mongering nation which causes other nations and people to think they must defend themselves against such bullying. I can feel comfortable with "my" positions, knowing that I will not allow the Bush administration - or any other administration - to brainwash me into believing their 'war' is moral, just, Constitutional and legal. This 'war' is all about OIL and WAR PROFITEERING. Nothing else. It's wrong, regardless of which political party initiates it or supports it (and the Democratic party, by failing to keep its promise to end this immoral war, demonstrates it support for it). -RKO- 09/10/07

2007-09-10 05:59:12 · answer #6 · answered by -RKO- 7 · 5 2

Simple: I DON'T. They are as utterly lacking in moral and social high-ground as the Republicans.

If they keep on this course I seriously doubt any Democrat will be getting my vote any time soon.

More than likely I'll be voting independent this next election.

2007-09-10 05:54:07 · answer #7 · answered by tiny Valkyrie 7 · 7 1

This is only ok because it's the democrats are doing it, if it were republicans it would create the scandal of the century!

2007-09-10 05:58:19 · answer #8 · answered by Mercadies2000 7 · 3 2

Hey, it's the lesser of two evils. At least the Democrats pay lip service to women's rights, and that's my most important issue.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
OK, I can see that you're just here to attack anybody who doesn't agree with you. Thanks for the 2 points, anyway.

2007-09-10 05:55:08 · answer #9 · answered by catrionn 6 · 2 5

Think 1st

Here is your source

http://www.aim.org/aim_report/4969_0_4_0_C/

2007-09-10 06:01:57 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers