Would you give them a fair trial, How many of you would be unbiased. So what chance have they got.
2007-09-10 05:18:10 · 12 answers · asked by Radiator 4 in News & Events ➔ Current Events
I can honestly say that I don't know what happened with the McCanns because I have not read the stories or even many YA questions, and when I do read a question, I don't know what it's about so I move on. This is the first question about the McCann matter that I have been able to understand and answer.
I would certainly be unbiased if picked for their jury, but I don't suppose it would be much fun.
2007-09-10 05:40:46 · answer #1 · answered by The First Dragon 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I can honestly answer that I might be able to be an unbiased juror.
I have been abroad since May and knew nothing about all of this McCann trauma.
Sure, I saw headlines and also questions posted here, but I never paid them any attention.
I remember making a memo to google search McCann, but I never did it.
Today, for the first time, the story was on Japanese T.V. news. Briefly, but enough to rekindle my interest.
I know very little about it, but what got my attention was that they live in Leicester, and so do I when I'm not working overseas.
I wouldn't want to be a juror though. Can't think of anything worse.
2007-09-10 12:29:39 · answer #2 · answered by kiteeze 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
A fair chance based on the evidence presented. So I wonder if they would say now they would not get a fair trial or that the police have planted the evidence to frame them. Wow, I would not be surprised.
2007-09-10 12:28:05 · answer #3 · answered by shafter 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If their trial happens in Portugal they will not have a jury.
Its very rare the use of a jury in Portugal and I believe only happened once or twice.
2007-09-10 13:31:28 · answer #4 · answered by ♥ Mummy ♥ 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have my opinions already but i can honestly say i would look and listen to all the evidence etc and be unbiased and would make a decision based on the evidence.
2007-09-10 13:01:03 · answer #5 · answered by mollymoosmummy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I could be unbiased, hard facts would be what i was looking for never mind the hype.
2007-09-10 12:28:09 · answer #6 · answered by christine m 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
For a child neglect case there would not have to be a jury - its open and shut! They left the children and plenty of witnesses,and their own admission.
2007-09-10 12:24:33 · answer #7 · answered by Van der Elst 6 · 3⤊ 1⤋
As I'm one of the people insisting that they are 'innocent until proven guilty' I think I'd be okay on the jury.
Unfortunately, that sick lynch mob scream louder and more often so it's their views that get the most space.
2007-09-10 12:32:49 · answer #8 · answered by Skidoo 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
I despise the Mccans but I'd still give them a fair trial. Its everyones right
2007-09-10 12:22:24 · answer #9 · answered by the troll 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋
if i was a jury member i'd be unbias depending on the evidence presented i'd cast my vote.
2007-09-10 12:49:15 · answer #10 · answered by daisy 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋