What ever "form" of religion terrorist would assume would you be willing to abandon for the sake of peace and human life? Is this at the point of Government vs Religion for the sake of peace?
2007-09-10 05:10:11 · 15 answers · asked by edubya 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Government should not have involvement in religion as long as religion is not giving habitat to crimnals of the world.
2007-09-10 05:19:52 · update #1
"Dismantle" is a strong term. I think if the U.S. stopped its active sponsorship of Israel, the terrorist threat would be greatly diminished, and those of us who do not want our tax dollars to be spent in support a foreign religious state would be pleased. If this resulted in the collapse of Israel, well, we've propped them up for too long anyway, and our friendship with them has become a liability.
2007-09-10 05:32:12 · answer #1 · answered by Who Else? 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Without doubt. It is unacceptable in world society for murder to be a part of an accepted religion. Supposedly anyway, but it would seem more and more people are turning towards radical Islam. Where the blank have peoples minds gone?
2007-09-10 05:20:44 · answer #2 · answered by xenypoo 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The USA has the Freedom of Religion in the Constitution. So, they cannot pass laws effecting a religion.
***
Citizen Cope:
Atheists Stalin and Mao killed plenty of people.
2007-09-10 05:17:50 · answer #3 · answered by civil_av8r 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
No. The constitution protects religion from government - but don't ask the religious far right - they'll tell you Islam is of Satan or some such nonsense.
2007-09-10 05:31:57 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
No thanks, "Anthem" isn't my idea of a Utopian society.
The bill of rights guarantees freedom FROM religion as much as freedom of religion, and that should be more than sufficient for ANY civilized society.
Just get rid of the zealots in this government who are trying to shove their repulsive dogma down everyone's throat, and that should solve a multitude of problems.
2007-09-10 05:18:34 · answer #5 · answered by tiny Valkyrie 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
No, because terrorist movement and government utterly has nothing to do with religion.
2007-09-10 06:07:09 · answer #6 · answered by Impiger 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
i does not unavoidably call it the top, yet i might call it the line to the techniques-blowing destruction of our Union. Barack Hussein Obama's administration and strategies, whilst possibly meant with solid intentions, are thoroughly the choice of what our Union become based upon and are risky to the steadiness and wellness of it. Americanism is Republicanism. Obama holds values that are greater identifiable to Socialism and Fascism, as do many different Democrats - Republicans, too, specially "Neo-Conservatives," or "neocons" for short. in case you realize your historic previous, you will see that societies like Rome had comparable fates - thriving Republics starting to be volatile (Socialist) Democracies ruled by way of skill of "mob rule" or the will of the individuals, and finally starting to be dictatorships, anarchy, or another comparable destiny. a style of eu Socialism or Fascism is what Obama has to furnish, regardless of what Democrats will argue. This "welfare state" and the "Democratizing" of our Union is what's premiere to its destruction. although, i might additionally argue that it is not Barack Obama who's finally accountable, however the voters of our Union for straying from the concepts which our founding fathers set in the previous us. it is the fault of the voters of this Union for electing Barack Obama into workplace. it is the fault of the voters of this Union for bringing approximately eu Socialism, for no longer understanding slightly approximately historic previous, their Union, Republicanism, and for pushing aside the form fullyyt. to respond to your question, specific - we are witnessing the top. Socialism has by no skill, ever, ever worked in historic previous. we are able to fall like Rome fell, and prefer how the european Union will fall.
2016-10-19 23:49:43 · answer #7 · answered by sherie 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Would a sane country permit a religion, which uses speech, to incite violence against it's populace and the overthrow of it's government?
What deserves dissolution is the ACLU and the other Soros funded groups.
2007-09-10 05:20:14 · answer #8 · answered by illiberal Illuminati 3 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Absolutely…..Religious belief has been the cause of far to much violence. When was the last time an Atheist started a war or committed a terror act?
2007-09-10 05:17:43 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Your question doesn't make much sense, but yes, I'd be more than willing to dismantle islam. It's a false religion that has caused nothing but trouble for the civilized world. It has nothing whatsoever to do with God and has caused untold misery around the world.
2007-09-10 05:17:11 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 5⤋