Abuse? No. Immature? Yes. All the father or whoever was taking the video had to do was reassure the child, but instead he thought it was funny the way the boy was concerned. I think the guy was a moron and so is the woman for not saying anything, but it's not abuse.
2007-09-10 04:25:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't know WHY someone would want that YouTube, but I don't think it qualifies as child abuse either. Had the mother not taken care of the baby after he started bleeding, THEN it could be considered neglect/child abuse.
2007-09-10 03:59:25
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It was sad that the little boy was so upset but looking at his face and listening to him made me laugh too. This was not child abuse, get a grip...
2007-09-10 04:08:42
·
answer #3
·
answered by kitkat 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No, it's not child abuse.
But it is ignorant.
That poor little boy was getting so frustrated, and all his dad was doing was laughing at him.
That just wasn't funny.
I didn't like that :{
2007-09-10 04:02:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by MommaBear 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
no but they should have explained to the child that it was juice not blood instead of laughing at him which obviously wound him up.
2007-09-10 04:00:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No but it was mean to laugh at that little boy who was so upset.
2007-09-10 04:02:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by Spring 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
That is definitely child abuse if that was true. These people should be prosecuted.
2007-09-10 04:01:05
·
answer #7
·
answered by countrygirl30143 2
·
0⤊
2⤋
never
2007-09-10 03:59:51
·
answer #8
·
answered by keral 6
·
0⤊
0⤋