leave IMMEDIATELY...
So - why are we still there?
2007-09-10 03:54:28 · 19 answers · asked by Your Teeth or Mine? 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I have found citing sources a complete waste.Then they screech about the source.I check things out before posting -good enough for me.
2007-09-10 08:12:09 · update #1
Because a few more years of bombing and those 47% will either be dead or finally scared to death convinced while taking their oil.
2007-09-10 03:58:05 · answer #1 · answered by Edge Caliber 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Because the Democrats don't have the guts to do anything that would force the troops to leave. IF they did and Iraq got a lot worse and the trouble spread elsewhere Democrats would have to take responsibility for what happened.
Democrats today in Congress do not want to take responsibility for anything. They just want to blame everything from Alzheimer's to Zimbabwe on Republicans.
Have you noticed how Democrats are so critical about what Republicans do, but offer no alternatives? GAWD forbid they should offer an alternative and the Republicans back it and it doesn't work. Then a Democrat position would be wrong and by present day standards that would signal the downfall of the entire Democrat Empire.
To be wrong on one thing would imply the possibility they are not infallible and therefore could be wrong about many of their other ideas. And since Democrats have told us for years they are never wrong, for years they would have lied to us.
2007-09-10 06:11:26 · answer #2 · answered by namsaev 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
We leave and they continue fighting among themselves like little kids and nobody to play babysitter. Don't forget Iran would be 1st in line to invade. It would get so much worse.
We are stuck there til they can get along with themselves. Just think if they could stop fighting for a few months, setup a police force and a functioning government that aren't corrupt we would be gone in no time.
2007-09-10 04:11:08 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Why do people insist on stating statistics without citing their source.
You do realize 47% wouldn't win a vote, right.
Let's say Kerry got 47% of the vote, that would still make him the loser.
2007-09-10 04:01:33 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
I'm guessing because 53% want us to stay. Where is your source? Do you have any backbone? We committed a humanitarian relief effort and congress voted 360-38 in favor of the Iraq Liberation Act. Here it is read it http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c105:H.R.4655.ENR:
2007-09-10 04:05:46 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Because we've got the firepower to do whatever we want to.
What I find amazing is that everyone is saying how unsafe it is to be in the streets in Iraq, but people are out there taking polls.
2007-09-10 04:01:16 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Hahahaha. 47 is smaller then 53. And where did you get that inf anyhow? not very smart
2007-09-10 04:01:02 · answer #7 · answered by Bego?a R 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Huckabee would rather you believe it is because of honor. We can't admit we made a mistake. We have to force people to believe that they need us.
2007-09-10 04:05:47 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
This is a democracy, and 47% is not a majority.
2007-09-10 03:59:32 · answer #9 · answered by Pfo 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I guess we're waiting for a two-thirds majority.
2007-09-10 04:03:32 · answer #10 · answered by fangtaiyang 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋