Consider the implications of being deaf or blind.
2007-09-10
03:50:54
·
9 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Social Science
➔ Psychology
Okay, I was hoping someone would bring up the fact that a deaf person is largely confined in terms of language. Many abstract concepts would probably be incomprehensible to them. Is that true? Due to acquiring a limited vocabulary, their understanding and thus their advancement of intellectual thought (like Philosophy) would be hindered. Don't you think?
As for a blind person, the only restriction they have visually, is that of perceiving colour, and patterns/ designs. But by their sense of touch, they can make out shapes. They would learn language and thus abstract comcepts perhaps as much as average human beings. And because of this, their comprehension and the ability to communicate wouldn't suffer.
You can disagree with me. But tell me now, who would possess a greater understanding of the world, the material and immaterial aspects of life? Who would be able to reason more?
2007-09-10
04:23:10 ·
update #1
I'm not referring to natural intelligence of a person here, but the amount and quality of information that they can extract from the environment, and then process in their mind, leading to intellectual growth.
2007-09-10
04:53:37 ·
update #2