If gay marriage "undermines the sanctity of marriage"...?

Question

then does that mean it should be illegal for atheists to get married?

How come there are no laws for that?

Answer 1

I would say that what truly underlyes the entire anti-gay marriage debate for the government is the unwillingness of an elected offical to take a stand.

I don't know what the big deal would be to let two people get married. I mean I am married and I pay higher taxes because of it. If they allowed gay marriage, it would increase tax revenue. No more head of house hold or individual tax returns.

The other side of your argument is that sexual orientation is not a protected status under the constitution. However the belief that there is or is not a God is protected. I believe that there will come a time when sexual orientation becomes a protected status as most of these protections came about do to constant and historical discrimination.

I know that many people who have never known a person that was gay are probably more afraid that their conduct is a perversion. Having worked for some one that was gay, I didn't find that to be the case. Now I know that it takes all kinds to make up a whole group. So I am sure there are just as many gay perverts as there are straight perverts.

I guess the bottom line here is that things are changing. It no longer means the end of a career to be found out. Some state courts are challenging the denial of marriage. Legislatures have responded with constitutional amendments to their state constitutions that ban gay marriage. I don't think those amendments will stand for long.

Keep on it. Your suggestion is a good one and should provide for more debate. Next time you get a chance, ask your elected representative the same question. I wonder what his or her answer would be.

Good Luck

Answer 2

Gay marriage may undermine the sancity of marriage.

The word sancity is from Middle English saunctite, from Anglo-French sainteté, from Latin sanctitat-, sanctitas, from sanctus = sacred.

So if the religious want to say that they see the quality or state of being holy or sacred, as being lost in Gay marriage, so what? If you don't like the heat, get out of the kitchen - if you find the Bible homophobic, and you are gay, then I guess it is not the religion for you?

being an atheist, I do not believe in god, so do not need to have a 'holy' marriage. It also has nothing what-so-ever to do with law? So as long as he/she is of a legal age to participate in a sexual relationship, then as an atheist i am not breaking any laws.

Apart from the stupid laws on inheritnce, why on earth do gay people feel they need the piece of paper to prove thier love? Marriage is a legal system of providing some sort of care for children, produced by a relationship. Since gay couples are not going to be breaking the population growth problems, then they technically dont have to haul themselves through that system. Its overpriced, the debt of the wedding is the cause of one in ten divorces.

Answer 3

Actually, I would think that since Marriage is and always has been a religious ceremony, that atheists would object to marriage. Even a "civil" ceremony is referred to on the Marriage Certificate as "The Bonds of Holy Matrimony". However, based on my above argument, I would think that "Government" should not have the right to restrict marriage as it is a religious ceremony and we are supposed to have a separation of church and state. Now if the gay couple can find a legitimate clergy to perform the ceremony is another issue, and government would also have no right to force a religion to hold a sacred ceremony against it's beliefs.

Answer 4

No. besides the reality that i've got self belief it would help lots, you do no longer could desire to have self belief to your marriage to contain the virtues mandatory for a marriage to honor God. it may genuinely be completed with the aid of accident. Homosexuality does not meet those standards at first. That being pronounced, it does not ask your self me if there are fairly some atheist marriages that don't honor God. having pronounced that, i'm particular there are various that do.

Answer 5

I think marriage is a special union of people by God for those who have faith .
Those who have faith or pretend they do are treated better by the faith community .
The government offers special treatment to married people and I think if it was ended then gay people and atheists would no longer need or want to get married to receive this special treatment .
Since no accepted religion recognizes the union of same sex relationships the government is able to practice a form of discrimination .

Lets take the benefit out of marriage and treat all tax payers equal .

Answer 6

That's a great question. Also, wouldn't divorce "undermine the sanctity of marriage"?

Answer 7

I was raised as a Catholic. I was taught, way back when, that the Catholic church didn't recognize a marriage performed by a civil servant, justice of the peace, or whatever. According the the Catholic church at that time, you weren't married in the eyes of God unless you were married in the church by a priest. As such, I don't see what all the fuss is about.

Answer 8

There is no such thing as gay marriage. Marriage is defined as the union between a man and woman. It is a sacrament instituted by Christ for this purpose.The gays can call their mutual union anything they want, but it it NO true marriage in any sense of the word.

Answer 9

The phrase 'sanctity of marriage' doesn't necessarily have religious connotations. The definition of sanctity is holiness of life and character.

Answer 10

Regards