Will America Attack Pakistan ? Because Gen. Musharraf is acting like Saddam ?

Question

Will America Attack Pakistan ? Because Gen. Musharraf is acting like Saddam ?

ISLAMABAD, Pakistan - Former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif was deported Monday hours after he had landed in Pakistan from seven years in exile hoping to campaign against the country's U.S.-allied military ruler, officials said.


About four hours after he arrived on a flight from London, Sharif was taken into custody and charged with corruption, but then quickly spirited to another plane and flown out of Pakistan toward Jeddah in Saudi Arabia, an intelligence official said.

An official in President Gen. Musharraf's office confirmed Sharif was deported but did not divulge his destination.

Both officials spoke on condition of anonymity as they were not authorized to speak to media. There was no immediate formal confirmation from the government.

Pakistan's Dawn News TV and ARY TV networks also reported that Sharif's destination was Jeddah.

Sharif's deportation came despite a landmark Supreme Court ruling last month that the two-time former premier, whose elected govern

Answer 1

America never uproots dictators who follow their dictate

Answer 2

The comparison between Musharraf and Saddam Hussein is not valid. The general may not be a shining example of a democratic leader, but he is not a blood-soaked tyrant responsible for the deaths of thousands nor has he invaded his neighbours. In fact he has made peace with his neighbours.
Sharif was a considerably worse leader of Pakistan who should be in prison, but has been deported. How many opponents of Saddam were treated like that?

Answer 3

human beings, i urge you all to think of the implications of attacking Pakistan. presently, this is no longer approximately who wins, on the tip of the day, US will finally end up putting in a lot greater money to rebuild Pakistan, to administration Pakistan and to combat inner conflicts in Pakistan. this could purely serve to radicalize and impoverish the inhabitants interior the long-term. Pakistan does no longer have industries or wealthy historic previous or minerals like different wealthy international places so it could under no circumstances get up via itself ft. it extremely is an economically based u . s . a . which purely survives on international promises and money remitting from distant places Pakistanis. besides the indisputable fact that i could say that Pakistani forces are a lot greater acceptable than that of Iraq or Afghanistan or perhaps Iran. whether, Pakistan will stand little or no danger if NATO, coalition forces, and India connect with attack Pakistan. whilst a rustic is going on shielding from all fronts, in many situations their forces crumple and if the comparable occurs, Pakistani forces won't even understand what hit them and (assuming first factor could be to smash nuclear launch web pages), Pakistan won't have a great gamble to launch a single N.Bomb. None of Pakistan's so called acquaintances will help Pakistan for the sake of their very very own economic equipment and international image. seek for the map of 'New midsection East' and do a sprint analysis on the historic previous of the map. you will see that regardless Pakistan is professional US or Anti US, the way forward for Pakistan and particularly much all midsection jap international places in accordance to the map is fairly gloomy (suprising yet I constantly theory that international places like Russia, China, and India have been greater 'unnatural').

Answer 4

First USA should give Pakistan the proper and latest equipment to seal its border with Afghanistan then criticize Pakistan, I wonder how Americans can only blame Pakistan for Taliban attacks? Since all 35 NATO nations are in Afghanistan with their latest equipments USA itself is there with the number one technology, Afghanistan should care about its borders but yet the whole world and specially USA blame only only PAKISTAN.
We all know that USA can't secure its easy border with Mexico with its world number one technology but they expect Pakistan to secure its Mountainous border with Afghanistan, i just wonder on the hypocrisy of Americans.
Securing Pakistan Afghanistan border is a joint joint joint responsibility of all NATO and specially AMERICAN & Afghanistan & then PAKISTAN.
And Pakistan has lost more troops & civilians than USA or any other country for this so called war of terror.
USA and WEST first look at their deeds then point out their fingers on Pakistan, USA must must must give Pakistan the latest spying equipments otherwise they should not expect something from Pakistan which is not possible even from them.
Bush praises Pakistan in terror fight - South and Central Asia - MSNBC.com
www.msnbc.msn.com/id/11651039/from/RSS
Dozens of soldiers missing in Pakistan tribal area - Yahoo! News
news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20070830/wl_afp/pakistanafghanistan_070830172923
AND LIST GOES ON AND ON AND ONNNNNNNNN
& LET ME CLEAR THIS THAT "PAKISTAN IS NOT AN COUNTRY SO USA OR ANY OTHER COUNTRY MAKE THEIR MOVE AND GET AWAY WITH IT".

Answer 5

SinceGen. Musharraf is an ally of U.s. and as they have nuclear weapon, I do not think that America will attack pakistan

Answer 6

pakistan should invade by Britain even Mahatma Gandhi agree my opinion Pakistan can't understand word of PEACE. Give Pakistan Independance is just waste Mahatma Gandhi energy.

Answer 7

America attack Pakistan. are u serious ???????
any way it is a good joke and should have been posted in jokes. I give u a star for your imaginatively beautiful question

Answer 8

Probably not. The war in Iraq is politically unpopular now, and we have one going in Afghanistan, too. The American people won't stand for a 3rd one.

Answer 9

pakistan should stop fighting wars on kashmir and terrorism and try to take things smoothly or else usa will definetly declare war..!

Answer 10

America can / will attack anyone if that benefit them. No friends or enemies