I saw 3:10 to Yuma, and the ending was kind of stupid, and open to very heated arguments. I think I understand what happened, but because it was not clear, the resolution could have gone several different ways.
I hate that because maybe it's a cop out to get away from coming up with a true ending because the director couldn't think of one. Also, it opens up numerous speculation and creativity on the ending, which may or may not be really what was intended to happen.
Forget the artsy nonsense, I just want clear, rational and believable endings. Vague endings are cop-outs and unsatisfyng.
2007-09-09 17:32:48 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
actually you did answer your own question....some directors,
writers, and/or producers think what makes a movie work is
to have a debate as to what happens "now"
2007-09-09 17:41:08 · answer #1 · answered by evensout 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your answers are what happens the majority of the time this happens.
And, of course, when there's money to be made in Hollywood, it'll be made. There can always be a sequel in the making. Take Hollywood's first $4 billion summer as an example.
2007-09-10 01:16:45 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Vague endings are often more exciting because they move you...they make you think about the film long after it is over. Any lame movie can spell it all out for you. One that can challenge you and leave some ambiguity is more rare and should be celebrated.
2007-09-10 09:56:41 · answer #3 · answered by Film Jedi 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It is because a sequel is in the making (if it clicks)...
2007-09-10 00:57:11 · answer #4 · answered by siryan 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because of the sequel ?!
2007-09-10 02:27:09 · answer #5 · answered by George 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋