I think it is a great idea, althought it is a LOT of work!! at least Yahoo are trying to patch things up. I see double and triple accounts in the future!
2007-09-09 18:11:42
·
answer #1
·
answered by gone 7
·
3⤊
0⤋
No, it wouldnt.
Thing is, these people lost their accounts because the content could be interpreted as a violation. This is an especially grey area when it comes to chatting. What one set of eyes sees at chatting, another set wont.
That is why it is critically important to appeal EVERY violation one gets and explain in a thorough and calm manner why it isnt a violation. Going over and screaming at the Yahoo employees over there will do nothing but get your appeal wadded up and tossed in the trash heap.
2007-09-09 14:00:27
·
answer #2
·
answered by Cletus_Maximus 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't know if it will be retroactive. I know that it will work now! That is if the blog they posted is manned properly. I mean, I'm not looking to be a "top reporter" that sounds insane, and a recipe for disaster, but, there has already been those thumbing their nose at this new blog. Cursing, pornography and bigotry still exists, and I am hoping that yahoo will attack this garbage with renewed vigor! Let the games begin!
2007-09-09 14:04:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by delux_version 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I dont understand how that would work! (APART from the FAULTY ONES that WERE DELETED BY MISTAKE & THERE SEEMED TO BE FAR TOO MANY OF THEM I LOST SOME FRIENDS LIKE THAT ) because HOW could they delete accounts if they did not deserve to be deleted??? i have no idea what they do to get deleted.
In other words HOW COULD YOU WRONGLY REPORT some one, SURELY YAHOO CHECKED AT THE TIME to make sure the person needed reporting if they didnt that was silly
2007-09-09 18:40:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by ausblue 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
sure, i do. i've got had 2 bills suspended. the two point 6. the two don't have been completely suspended. and that i've got been given suspended two times (from the two bills) interior of a year. Y!A restored the 1st account two times after R&S trolls attacked it LOL, however the third time they did it, i in no way heard back the main cutting-edge suspension grow to be because of the fact Y!A mentioned i violated the TOS with a facetious Q. (i did no longer). no one replied to my 2d allure. (no longer even an computerized 'we've gained your digital mail' digital mail). *sighs* Trolls that paintings for Y!A suck. *sighs* for this reason i'm purely on point 3 after being here almost 2 years. this is not any longer ordinary attending to point 6 you comprehend. this is conflict and that i prefer blood. *sighs* xoxo ?
2016-11-14 19:52:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by dagnone 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Do you really believe that Yahoo would go back, and reinstate all those falsely reported people? That would take too much time, and I doubt they would take the time to do that. When your account is gone, it's gone. We can only hope that they would do that.
2007-09-09 13:59:48
·
answer #6
·
answered by Nerds Rule! 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
A great idea and I firmly support it; the incidence of false reportage on R&S is horrendous and there is no human evaluation.
2007-09-09 13:58:46
·
answer #7
·
answered by Galahad 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
It would be nice if they actually did pay attention to what was being reported.....
I mean, people have had really nasty photos as avatars & posted sick questions & gotten away with it..... while others who were clearly just kidding around got kicked off.....
2007-09-09 13:57:15
·
answer #8
·
answered by from HJ 7
·
5⤊
0⤋
Sounds like a great idea to me.
♪♫ L
2007-09-09 13:58:15
·
answer #9
·
answered by lanalang 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
I think everything should be positively validated as true before suspensions
2007-09-09 13:59:27
·
answer #10
·
answered by luckford2004 7
·
2⤊
0⤋