English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

please explain.

2007-09-09 13:52:24 · 14 answers · asked by rusalka 3 in News & Events Current Events

14 answers

How to reduce terrorism the Bush Plan
Blame the wrong people because the ones who attacked were your close business associates.
Invade a country looking for weapons you sold them ealier
so they must be there.
Bomb the h*ll out of that country and kill of many people so as to thuoroughly piss them off, and give many of them nothing else to live for but your destruction
Tell them you are trying to "help" them by installing a puppet
government that takes orders from you.
and bankrupt your own country paying for the war.
Lie to your citizens and say It's working
Don't forget you only serve 2 terms so what the h*ll.
Over all it sounds like a failure to me.

2007-09-09 14:09:34 · answer #1 · answered by wise old sage 4 · 1 1

What is terrorism? It is the act of causing terror to innocents through your words or behaviours. So how do you think the innocent civilians in Bagdad feel when they hear gunfire, explosions etc.

Is there such a thing as Good Terrorism? Is that what freedom fighting is?

I guess it all depends on selective reading ... are you a

"Thou shalt not kill" sort of person, or more of an "Eye for and eye" gun toting cowboy?

I cannot get to grips with any of it really. All I know that using arms to protect economic wealth cannot be a good thing, even if you wear a white hat and ride a white horse.

2007-09-13 05:15:35 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It's not; it is focusing the action away from American shores. Basically, the Islamrads are going there killing fellow Muslims and getting a black eye and are not here.

Skeptic: One and two look reasonable but three is not. After all, it is the French and Russian oil companies that have invested heavily in the Iraqi oil fields and both are nationalistic. For some reason (stomp, stomp, stomp), they were opposed to the war too and got really mad when the USA said that only companies from the Coalition of the Willing would get reconstruction contracts.

2007-09-09 14:14:14 · answer #3 · answered by Caninelegion 7 · 0 1

It's not. The "occupation" of Iraq is causing more recruits for suicide bombing activities and other terrorist acts.

When fighting fire with fire, remember that the fire department usually uses water. This is an "occupation", not a war.

The administration is having a hard time explaining why we are occupying the country. Which is most likely?

- riding the world of terrorism.
- bringing freedom and democracy to Iraq.
- providing multinational corporations with oil leases.

2007-09-09 14:13:27 · answer #4 · answered by Skeptic 7 · 0 0

in case you have somebody ithat leads a terrorist team which could use atomic weapons on somebody then you definately could do away with that man or woman. An atomic weapon wasn't used on US soil, in spite of the undeniable fact that a weapon of mass destruction substitute into and that i can not have self assurance that somebody might deliver this up on an afternoon which includes in the present day. anybody that would not no longer help the selection to pass in there and do away with a frontrunner needs to pass away this united states. All political time table aside, I totally help the conflict against Bin weighted down.

2016-10-10 06:56:32 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

The American Soldiers and Collation forces, I believe has made an difference. Although, the Military Channel and I heard this on the news, they are fighting the Iranian's, Syrians, and so many different miliats groups.

Plus they have beignn caught several times trying to enter the U.S. So since we haven't been hit is a good sign.

Sorry for the errors, my key board has had it.






ai

2007-09-09 19:44:52 · answer #6 · answered by NJ 6 · 1 0

According to all reports, Bush's war in Iraq has increased terrorism dramatically.

We listened to the Liberals in WWII and fought Hitler. Bush's grandfather had his assets frozen by Congress for funding Hitler. He was among many Conservatives that didn't want to get involved in WWII because they were making money by supplying Hitler with war supplies.

Unfortunately, Fascism took hold in the US in the 50's and has thrived through the actions of Conservatives. Nixon, Reagan and both Bushes have helped Hitler's dream of bringing Fascism to the US a reality.

2007-09-09 14:41:34 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 2

Biggest flytrap in the Middle-East, while other people are working at giving Islam time for a social revolution into making freedom part of their culture.

2007-09-09 14:51:44 · answer #8 · answered by mckenziecalhoun 7 · 1 1

To me not a tuff one to answer but to Liberal's it is because there rationing is if we fight back it might make them really mad at us,but in my humble opinion if we had listened to the Liberal's Hitler would have conquered the world. But to me every time we kill a terrorist that is one less to deal with....

2007-09-09 14:20:32 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Its not,

at best it might be displacing it by putting the primary focus on Iraq.

2007-09-09 13:57:06 · answer #10 · answered by Gamla Joe 7 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers