Like the Cons are defending the ruinous domestic and foreign policies in Bush's last 500 days?
2007-09-09 13:19:12 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Don't get out much do you junior...
2007-09-09 14:20:30 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yes for the 3rd Reich was righteous Hitler made Germany rise from the ashes of the treaty of Versailles into a superpower in just 10 years.The United States did not truly become a superpower until after WWII in which it stole much German Tech and Research Not to mention the crime rate was so much lower than the United States Freedom is a great idea but people need control they need a strong government to protect them from themselves I am a Fascist and proud for I stand for order over chaos and Now Science is proving more and more through genetic research what Hitler knew 60 years ago That we whites are the master race For more info on National Socialism go to www.nsm88.com
2007-09-09 15:44:35 · answer #2 · answered by Robert J 1 · 2⤊ 1⤋
In the beginning of those 'last 500 days', Hitler was still alive, well and very strong. He thought nothing of killing anyone who stood in his way, including Germans and those he considered to be defectors.
Your comparison demonstrates that you need to read, study and learn a lot more about history. Keep in mind also that many millions that weren't Jews, also lost their lives in concentration camps. So, as you sit very safely behind your computer, hidden.... You can obviously type what you wish. And guess what, you have the freedom to do that. Something that the Germans didn't have.
2007-09-09 14:08:27 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
If I were a German in the last days of the Third Reich, I would DEFEND MY COUNTRY to the last drop of blood in my body. Remember, those Germans were defending themselves against an invasion by the dirty, backwards Communists, most of whom were practically illiterate, ignorant peasants who had never seen a flush toilent before.
I want you to consider this very thoroughly: when the German army had been beaten back by the Communists, Berlin was valiently defended...... by a ragtag group of less than 500 German youth, mainly children and young teens. These young people showed the most amazing bravery, fortitude, and selflessness. For almost a week, these young people successfully kept the Communists from advancing into the city. Berlin was a very divided city; many of these youth were not part of the Nazi youth movement, and their parents had refused to join the Nazi party. (you probably think everyone in Germany was part of the Nazis, don't you? Read up on the real history of Berlin, and WWII Germany in general)
Imagine if these young people had been defending the U.S. against a Communist invasion. We would have immortalized them in song, and carved monuments in their honor. Imagine how terrifying it must have been for such a small group to attempt the Herculean feat of driving the Communist scourge out of Berlin. They were alone. They had practically no food, and if they got wounded, they would be in agony; there were no doctors to help them.
Compare this with the pampered, bored, directionless youth in America today, lounging around at home, wasting the day playing on their Game Boy and getting fat sitting on the sofa watching yet another vapid, brain-destroying tv show.
9-11 cost our economy $180 Billion dollars. The next attack would probably have been much worse, but Bush has prevented it from happening by keeping the terrorists on the run, out of funds, and unable to communicate with each other since we are monitoring phone communication.
You know what has happened due to Bush? The concept of democracy is racing through the Middle East. Women are starting to demand rights, and slowly those societies are granting them. Women have been able to vote in some Middle Eastern countries whereas they had never been allowed to before, and it's all due to our intervention in Iraq.
You probably haven't grasped how momentous the changes are. Democracy requires freedom, and as freedom replaces the backwards, ignorant, insulated regimes in the Middle East, the conditions that promote terrorism will fall apart.
Read the links below. You'll understand what I'm referring to. And I look forward to your next post, which I hope will be "Is it possible that George W. Bush is actually right?"
************************************************************************************
I'll bet anything the people who gave me Thumbs Down were too lazy to read the compelling, thought-provoking links below. Hence, you are fated to never learning anything. It's a typical Lib trait.
2007-09-09 14:09:45 · answer #4 · answered by pachl@sbcglobal.net 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Not every German was a Nazi. So no, I would not.
President Bush has not seen another terrorist attack since 9/11, so he may be doing something right. He was not President when Moslim terrorists murdered Israeli athletes at Munich. He was not President when Moslim terrorists hijacked the cruise ship Achille Laura, when Moslim terrorists attacked the Marine barracks in Beruit ( were you outraged when 254 U.S.Marines were killed by Moslim terrorist suicide bombers ), or the Moslim terrorist attack on the USS Cole, or the attack on the World Trade Center Building in the 90's. Don't worry, if a liberal democrat becomes President, you will be given a Quran in English or Spanish.
2007-09-09 13:37:54 · answer #5 · answered by Charles S 4 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Hell Yes,
As those poison gas pellets dropped on my naked shower prepped body I'd be singing......
Deutschland, Deutschland über alles,
Über alles in der Welt....
What kind of pathetic whining wussie commie sympathizer can't support his Führer?
Seriously though...
RUINOUS domestic policies? What part of 'Good Economy' is confusing you?
And please tell me you know that Bush, who supports the war...
Has a higher approval ratting than Congress, that opposes it.
2007-09-09 15:54:42 · answer #6 · answered by Phoenix Quill 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No I wouldn't and neither did they. Hitlers partners CUT AND RUN when they saw smoke in the kitchen.
2007-09-10 00:10:03 · answer #7 · answered by Tall Chicky 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
There are many people who cannot admit they were wrong or that they put their trust in someone who betrayed it. Those people, now and then, claim to still be loyal to the leader who ran their country into a deep ditch. Secretly perhaps they have doubts.
2007-09-09 14:04:22 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
No way!
As many of his men didn't follow orders to the T either!
2007-09-09 22:02:48 · answer #9 · answered by goodbloke45 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
How original, comparing Bush to Hitler. Haven't heard THAT one yet.
2007-09-09 13:24:30 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 2⤋
My turn. You still write love letters to Stalin's tomb. Boo ya!
2007-09-09 13:27:32 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋