English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

9 answers

Its simple, really. The Shiite nation of Iran says Iraq owes them indemnities because of the Iran-Iraq war. The Shias of Iraq are the majority and have been getting aid from Iran (see Al Sadr). The payoff will be when Iraq Shias willingly submit and their territory becomes part of Iran with Al Sadr as Governor.

The rest of Iraq will be in unrest as there will be a civil war in the Sunni sections with heavy Arabian financing and al Qaeda investment.

The Kurdish North will be invaded by Turkey to stamp out the PKK problem and most likely annexed by Turkey.

2007-09-09 13:13:11 · answer #1 · answered by mandrake62896 2 · 1 0

The Iraqis are screwed; they have no choice. The United States has already taken over their country and won't be leaving anytime soon.
That's why the U.S. is building the largest embassy in the world on a 104-acre site in downtown Baghdad overlooking the 'new' Iraqi puppet government installed by the Bush administration.
That's why Halliburton is building fourteen (yes - 14!) new permanent U.S. military bases in Iraq.
The United States intends to be 'in' Iraq for decades - perhaps generations - until we've sucked every drop of OIL from Iraq's sand.
We attacked another sovereign nation that in no way threatened, provoked or attacked the United States for three really lame reasons:
1. The Bush family had a personal vendetta against Saddam Hussein ever since Desert Storm when George H.W. Bush was ridiculed, criticized and humiliated for not 'finishing the job' and ousting Hussein at that time. George W. Bush was selected to be President so he could 'finish the job' and 'settle the score' with Hussein;
2. Dick Cheney and his Exxon-Mobil buddies want all that OIL swimming underneath Iraq's sand so they can feed America's addiction to cheap, easily-accessible foreign OIL instead of developing alternative fuels;
3. Ever since World War II, the giant U.S. military-industrial complex [which Eisenhower warned us about] realized how profitable 'war' could be. So all the politicians were bought up, pricey lobbyists were hired, and special interest groups were formed to promote and encourage more 'war'. Thus, the U.S. got entangled in the Korean Coflict; the Cuban Missile Crisis; the Cold War; Vietnam and Desert Storm - all so corporations like McDonnell-Douglass, Lockheed-Martin and Sikorsky could boost their sagging profits after years of 'peace'. Add to that the two 'newcomers' to the government's war trough: the Carlyle Group and Halliburton BOTH had direct ties to the Bush-Cheney White House. This 'war' was all about OIL and WAR PROFITEERING from the very beginning.
Now consider this:
"It's embarrassing that George W. keeps trying to deceive the American public about developments in Iraq, but it's shameful that the media establishment blithely goes along, parroting Bush's deceit.
Take Bush's high-pressure push to ram his new oil law through the Iraqi Parliament. the official line is that this is a healing measure that would provide for a fair distribution of oil profits among Iraq's Shiites, Sunnis and Kurds - and its passage is the number-one non-military benchmark that the White House has set to measure Iraq's 'progress'.
Major media outlets...have swallowed Bush line whole, frequently and unquestioningly reporting that, for some reason, those quarrelsome Iraqis can't even agree on something as basic as sharing oil revenues.
Truth is, this is not about sharing profits, but about a cynical power grab by multinational oil giants. Big Oil got the Bushites to write a provision into the proposed law that would open two thirds of Iraq's oil fields to ownership by foreign corporations - unlike Saudi Arabia, Venezuela and Ira which all control their oil drilling and extraction.
In short, the law would force Iraq to surrender sovereignty over its most valuable economic resource - and that's why it is not passing. One thing the nation's politicians all can see is just how vehement public opposition to Big Oil's law is.
So when you see stories about Bush, Cheney and others imploring Iraq's Parliament to pass this law - remember, they're not promoting national reconciliation, they're promoting a houseful oil scam."*
-RKO- 09/09/07

2007-09-09 20:24:44 · answer #2 · answered by -RKO- 7 · 0 0

If the bogus Iraqi 'government' made noises like 'Let's have a vote on the subject of 'foreign fighters' in Iraq you can bet it would never happen. The Bush Junta isn't going to allow their 'Vichy Iraq' 'government' to stray off the reservation. God help them if they sponsored a vote to divide Iraq into three seperate countries with a central oil ministry that cut out any US influence. Both of those votes would leave the US high and dry and out of the area. Let's suggest that the Bush Junta allow this kind of vote...let's see what they say to that?

2007-09-09 20:11:38 · answer #3 · answered by Noah H 7 · 1 0

Pretty much what would have happened to Germany if we had cleared out before weeding out the Nazi's.

Seriously, it would be back to advocating Jewish genocide and killing anyone any one not conforming to the proper belief.

2007-09-09 20:19:23 · answer #4 · answered by Phoenix Quill 7 · 0 2

Bush already said "mission accomplished".

2007-09-09 20:06:08 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Which ones? The insurgents clearly do not want us there. Should our nation bend our will to those people? No way!

2007-09-09 20:10:37 · answer #6 · answered by Shrink 5 · 0 2

I reckon Bush won't do anything as he is not for democracy.

2007-09-09 20:05:25 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

They have already told us they no longer want us there, but we are still there.

2007-09-09 20:08:48 · answer #8 · answered by outsider_27 4 · 1 0

then we bail and they will all be shot and realize that they arnt better off without us

2007-09-09 20:04:33 · answer #9 · answered by simkvn64 2 · 1 2

fedest.com, questions and answers