English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If that's the worst thing they can think of that Bill's done, that's pretty sad. I can think of 10 Republicans up top of my head that have gotten in trouble for scandals that are much worse than that (like soliciting a policeman for sex), and that's just recently. What's the harm in engaging in beautiful love acts with a gorgeous younger woman? Bill Clinton did NOT lie about it either. He did not engage in s-e-x, just oral activity, and I don't think of that as s-e-x. Republicans need to focus on their own bunch of criminals.

2007-09-09 11:49:54 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

Lillian, it's pretty sad to see a woman supporting the GOP. You want to elect someone who will take your rights to your own body away from you? Guess you've been brainwashed by your angry white man hubby who will probably get smart and leave you for an even more submissive Asian woman. You need to get smart and support the Democrats because the Republicans are going down!

2007-09-09 12:09:10 · update #1

20 answers

If that was all he had done, there would never be a problem. But we both know that Monica was the least of his indiscretions and crimes. You need to get a brain.

I am smart and I will always vote for equal rights. Not special rights. Don't talk to me about Bill Clinton, I am an Adult and know what sex IS. To think it was a beautiful sex act tells me a lot about your mentality. I am proud to not be in the same group that would have you for a member. You take women's rights back to 1919.

2007-09-09 11:55:39 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 10 4

Socially in this Country women are tired of being taken advantage of by men (particularly cheating husbands.)

99.9% of married women in America would probably not agree that a 19-yr-old young lady giving her 25-yr-old husband oral sex is an understanding behavior. If he's 50-yrs-old and she's 19 is that okay?

My opinion is that soliciting someone for sex isn't half as bad as getting caught AFTER the sexual contact already took place and then denying it for over a year.

Clinton cost the American tax payers millions of dollars. Craig hadn't cost them a thing.

Likewise Clinton had a list of women he had troubles with and did nothing to distance himself from prospective troubles or issues - instead he ended up finally getting caught... After no less then four other women complained about his ever so repetitive questionable behavior.

So honestly, who's more the hypocrite... Senator Craig or President Bill Clinton?

2007-09-09 12:10:27 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Diddling an intern with a cigar is cheap sex, not beautiful love making. Getting a BJ is sex. If BJ's weren't sex, most pedophiles(who are disgusting animals) would not be in trouble. If a BJ is not sex, why not do it in public? Oral activity is sex, but I'm glad there are dumb girls that think it's not.
If you watch closely, you will see the Republicans throw their perverts overboard, while the Democrats justify theirs.
All former President Clinton had to do was fess up, and say look at who I'm married to, I couldn't help myself. We would have laughed and forgot about it.
The issue was he is a serial rapist and we can't figure out why women defend him. Find out about his other extramarital activities, he abuses women.
If you were my wife, would it be ok if I got a BJ from another woman? Or would that be sex then? I think I like you, I could be your spouse, orally satisfy other women or get orally satisfied by other women, and it would't be sex. Do you like swinger parties?

2007-09-09 12:15:34 · answer #3 · answered by Charles S 4 · 1 1

Its supposed to make all democrats ashamed to get up in the morning. Frankly, I assume no responsibility for what happened with Monica nor do I condone it. I still think Bill was a much better president than Bush. I wasn't concerned that the country would go bankrupt, that we might be giving up our sovereignty, losing our rights under the Constitution, or called unpatriotic because I voiced my opinion. I could go on and on, but why.

2007-09-09 12:01:59 · answer #4 · answered by BekindtoAnimals22 7 · 2 3

Not even close to the worst thing that Bill Clinton did, because he did so many bad things on so many levels. For starters, as far as presidential pardons go, that pardon of Marc Rich was about as sleazy as it gets, and there were many others.

2007-09-09 11:58:49 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 7 0

Because it diverts our attention away from other issues where they have the weaker arguments. It's the same reason why they try to use the fear tactic to make Americans believe only a Republican will make America safe.

2007-09-09 12:25:02 · answer #6 · answered by Kate J 3 · 1 1

I didnt know I did. I can tell you a worse thing he has done. He vetoed the Partial Birth Abortion Ban...twice. He reduced our military. He faked peace withthe Middle East. Shaking hands and taking pictures is nice, but it doesnt solve the real problem. Yeah, he dropped a few bombs. But it obviously wasnt enough. What's wrong with cheating on your wife with some whore? Go figure. it really increases the prestige of teh Presidency as well, doesnt it? (sarcasm). Clinton did good for teh economy, but that is where it ends.

2007-09-09 11:58:07 · answer #7 · answered by Daniel 6 · 6 2

Because this is the only "big" thing that Clinton did to make himself, his administration, and his party look bad. I think it's good when people rant about this being a huge issue because it proves that there really isn't anything else for them to ***** about. I'd rather our president get a bj than spend all our tax dollars waging war in the middle of nowhere.

-----------------------

Hey Koalatcomics, I could write a list for 5 pages long regarding all the crap president Bush has done and it would it would be a lot worse in comparison. Right at the top would be lying under oath. Bush has destroyed the reputation of this country and his party. In the process we have lost thousands of American lives and created just as many American hating extremists. What Clinton did was minuscule in comparison.

2007-09-09 11:57:58 · answer #8 · answered by danksquish 3 · 3 5

Desperation

2007-09-09 12:09:46 · answer #9 · answered by Diane P 3 · 2 2

You're right. The sex was consensual, even if it wasn't morally right. Clinton has paid dearly for his bj and continues to pay for it. I don't understand why his screw up is more important than the Iraq war and the other problems this administration has had.

2007-09-09 11:56:36 · answer #10 · answered by katydid 7 · 7 2

fedest.com, questions and answers