There are signs in the MC canns behaviour. The lack of emotion is not normal here. Their blogging about runs on the coast and going to dinners etc. Come on, do you really think if your child was abducted that you would be blogging about normal everyday things and posting the daily happenings of their other children on the net, when there is supposedly a psyhco out there that has abducted one of their children.NO. you would be keeping as much to yourself as possible, only emerging to give any necessary public appeals. this is an obvious attempt to portray themselves as Mr and Mrs normal and endear the public to them. A common tactic of liars; CHARMING people into thinking they are 'wonderful, lovely people'. I have seen red flags in their behaviuor and I'm not a so called 'truth wizard'. sorry but your so called talent will be exposed as a load of junk. It would not be a surprise if a narcissistic, selfish married couple, more interested in their social life than their kids, who may of accidentally killed their own daughter, who have reputations in society to 'protect' as a GP and Heart doctor, would go to extreme lengths to cover this up. It's happened before. Remember Jon Benet? Rest in peace. sorry, i know this is harsh, but it is not a impossibility that they have concocted this abduction story, it is actually quite plausible.
2007-09-09 11:52:57
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Talk about innocent until proven guilty does my head in,since when has the british or Irish justice system produced anything other than frustration and mistrust among those it is supposed to provide justice for.
This is not a black and white case,far from it,they are Definitely guilty of neglect, both of Madeline, and since the event, they have not exactly been a ROCK for their other children,would it not be usual in this country or in britian for social workers to interview the siblings of the missing/murdered child, if for nothing other than to determine what effect,if any, it is having on them. and in the course of this process, if any alarm bells should ring such as "Mammys secret sleep sweeties,etc etc etc."the department of social and family affairs are obliged to bring this to the attention of the police.
In alll i think it is not WHO was asked WHAT, but rather WHO WASN'T ASKED ANYTHING; IE the twins, they are as close to material witnessess' as is available. Although i have no doubt the well educated, highly informed McCanns are aware of this, and would that have anything to do with their prevention of these (possibly endangered twins)from having contact with such Authorities.
Just my opinion,if i can't air it here,where can I?
John.
2007-09-11 18:22:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by koogangles 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I wonder if they searched the crypt in the Church? It would explain why the Mccanns suddenly became so religious.
The point about the Mcanns jetting off around Europe and constantly leaving their remaining two kids was well made. Id not let my remaining kids out of my sight!
Even if they didnt kill her (or if it can never be proved - no doubt their lawyers will be pretty powerful and well paid!) they are without doubt and in their own admission guilty of the most appalling neglect and, if the rumours are true of Maddie crying calling for them all night, abuse. They must be prosecuted (by UK authorities) or the precedent is set.
2007-09-11 15:36:34
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
YES If they were guilty why have they not been charged.To charge anyone of kidnapping,murder or abduction you need evidence,and there is none Hence no charge.Do you know what happend? If so tell the police and stop writing rubbish on here
2007-09-09 18:54:32
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Pathetic vigilante morons cannot understand the difference between established, verified fact and media fiction, and these idiots will undoubtedly stalk them... with no regard for the twins.
I appreciate that the parents may not be innocent but equally they may not be guilty. what winds me up is those who can't comprehend that NOBODY here knows all the facts.
2007-09-09 18:52:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by Kitten 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
I haven't read or seen anything yet that proves to me they are quilty. If you think for one minute that Yahoo msg board proves it you have another thought coming.
2007-09-09 18:52:52
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Are you still presuming someone to be guilty until proven innocent?
2007-09-09 18:52:41
·
answer #7
·
answered by -RKO- 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
No. But it took me around two weeks to realise that there may be more than meets the eye
2007-09-09 18:50:25
·
answer #8
·
answered by the troll 3
·
1⤊
2⤋
no ; if it walks like a duck and quacks like one, it is one; if something doesn't make sense , more times than not , it is not true; too many parents/people crying help me find the killer and low and behold they are one; Scott Peterson, Susan Smith etc
2007-09-09 18:58:23
·
answer #9
·
answered by sml 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
Not guilty until proven guilty.
Sloppy police work?
2007-09-09 18:54:50
·
answer #10
·
answered by yasses 4
·
2⤊
1⤋