No WMD's
No terrorist training camps
No support of terrorism
Isn't "winning" there like beating the crap out of your kid for something you know they didn't do?
2007-09-09 11:18:24 · 26 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Words, words, words.
Like Dead Marxist and RLP.
Don't worry...they're looking out for our "best interests."
Just follow them blindly, and everything will be O-Tay!
2007-09-09 12:28:55 · answer #1 · answered by John Doe 1st 4 · 5⤊ 7⤋
Report me if you like for being a *****, I officially don't care but Nateena is a bloody liar. 4% of her answers are best answers. Never been given a best answer? Take a long walk off a short cliff you lying rat. But that was a fairly good joke. Didn't make me laugh but it was original.
2016-05-20 09:34:55 · answer #2 · answered by josefa 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
there were traces of wmds, there was definitely at least 15 different terrorist training camps, even hillary and most of the dems stated that iraq supported terrorism
we need to win!!!
2007-09-16 17:28:25 · answer #3 · answered by Ted M 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
LMAO Using the cons twisted logic there's one thing worse than beating the crap out of your kid for something you know they didn't do. And that is trying to beat the crap out of your kid for something you know they didn't do, and instead having them beat the crap out of you instead.
2007-09-10 03:23:34 · answer #4 · answered by ? 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
All the pointless deaths - to them -will be validated because they can then jump up and down on their Astro-Turf maniacally screaming"Were Number 1" -just like after a high school football game.......
2007-09-10 00:54:41 · answer #5 · answered by Your Teeth or Mine? 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
What exactly does "winning" in Iraq mean?
Does Bush and the military know? They have a fractured country, a smokescreen of a government and terrorists pouring in from all sides. So, exactly how do we win? We can't Nuke them because we'll hurt on our own interests.
The solution is not simple.
2007-09-09 11:33:23 · answer #6 · answered by Jackie Oh! 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
By cons I'm guessing that you mean the Republicans. Well guess what it wasn't only the Republicans who violated the Constitution and authorized Bush to go to war without a declaration of war. So the Republicans and many Democrats voted some sort of made up authorization to allow Bush to do it. So now that things aren't going too well they can all say: "if I knew then, what I know now". That is a complete copout. That is why the Founders made it clear that we don't go to war without a declaration of war.
2007-09-09 11:28:12 · answer #7 · answered by LittleLamb 2 · 4⤊ 3⤋
The multinational oil companies have won in Iraq. The American people and the Iraqi citizens are the big losers.
2007-09-09 11:29:38 · answer #8 · answered by Skeptic 7 · 8⤊ 1⤋
There is no logic among the conservatives. They are sheep led by the insane politburos!
2007-09-14 17:26:21 · answer #9 · answered by little timmie 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Wow, what an intelligent question, the only thing thats twisted in a sad sort of way is the fact that you LIBS never get your facts straight, you ramble on without them as if you know what you're talkin about.. Good job!
2007-09-10 04:29:34 · answer #10 · answered by Freethinker 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋
I guess paying $25,000. a head for suicide bombers doesn't qualify in your book.
I guess terrorizing his own countrymen and women doesn't either. Especially the women, but I guess you don't care about that...
Killing his own people doesn't count either, honey, even though it was done with WMD, what? you think he might have used it all?
I guess you don't give the UN any credence either, honey, since it let Saddam off. No matter... who cares if Iraq broke resolutions for 16 yrs! There was money to be made in the oil for food program. Who the hell were we to mess up France's and Russia's incomes?? Gezzz!
2007-09-09 20:55:41 · answer #11 · answered by LoneStar 4 · 1⤊ 4⤋