Why is David Hume skeptical about "natural theology"?

Answer 1

he believed that peoples view points were clouded by custom, habits, society etc, and that all beliefs came threw experience, and in order to be a rational belief it must be supported by evidence, add all that together and compare it to "natural theology" (which deals with what a person can reason, and find evidence for, of God, and Gods nature, outside of anything divinely revealed )
Hume did not think there was enough evidence to allow humans to do that, prove Gods nature(the focus was more on what God is, not if there was a God
keep in mind that during the time of his writings, a person had to be very careful to speak out at all against the current religions and views, or else get hung or imprisioned, he may of wanted to say he didnt feel anyone could prove God at all!

Answer 2

a million) "The rules of Nature are codified as a effect of previous reports." around reasoning. If one has experienced a miracle, than this is a factor of his or her "previous reports". whether, he tries to cut back such reports to persons which could be codified. 2) "whether the risk that some thing has occurred in contradiction of all previous journey...." Miracles do no longer contradict previous journey, they simply selection. 3) "whether the risk that some thing has occurred in contradiction of all previous journey could desire to continually be judged to be decrease than the risk that the two my senses have deceived me or the guy recounting the astonishing prevalence is mendacity or incorrect, all of which I actual have previous journey of." whether he adjusted the contradiction/selection objection, notably much all new reports selection to a pair degree from previous reports, even, or maybe rather, the journey of being born. additionally, I doubt very many might continuously be conscious this type of rule. as an occasion, we've had examples the place human beings have lied (Piltdown guy) or been incorrect (Nebraska guy) on the subject of the info for evolution, yet that doesn't seem to disqualify the "concept" from being taken heavily. As for his opinions: human beings normally lie, and that they have got solid motives to lie approximately what they like human beings to think of has been scientifically shown the two by way of fact they have self belief they're doing so for the income of their scientific ideals or by way of repute that consequences. See how basic that replaced into? human beings with the aid of nature delight in concerning scientific "theories" they have heard without taking good care of their veracity and for this reason scientific "theories" are actual transmitted even the place fake. "Hume notes that miracles seem to happen...."- poisoning the properly/argument from novelty "The miracles of each faith argue against all different religions and their miracles...."- assumes that each declare of a miracle is the two valid while there could desire to be massive transformations interior the quantity of help that distinctive claims have. returned, I doubt he'd be conscious an equivalent theory to technological know-how.