1. F
2. F
3. F though there were warnings
4. F emphatically
5. dk never heard that one.
2007-09-09 10:40:41
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
1. T
2. T
3. T
4. T
5. T
I'm not sure about your use of the word 'BUSH'. He may or may not have direct knowedge. It's common for a leader to have plausable deniability in a case like this. In other words, he is in a meeting with the head of NSA.
He says something like,' I can't justify to Congress the use of military force unless a terrorist act occurs on U.S. soil. And it would have to be a BIG one, something that destroys an American icon, like the Statue of Liberty.'
His advisor says,'Well, that might not even do it. After all, the Statue of Liberty sits in the harbor. I don't think it would hit the public the same way as a target that sits on land.'
Bush,'Well, if a big enough land target were attacked, it might actually sway Congress. What are the chances that this attack will happen within the next three months? We need to get the wheels in motion.'
And so on...Bush never 'orders' the attack. Other people coordinate it. It's just understood that this is what will help his administration.
2007-09-09 10:42:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
1. F, No credible evidence supports that theory.
2.F
3.Y, but Clinton knew in 96 and I doubt he gave Bush all the facts.
4.F, No evidence that is true.
5.F, There were no rules of engagement that allowed US pilots to shoot down commercial aircraft. The has never been the policy of our government.
2007-09-09 10:40:33
·
answer #3
·
answered by smsmith500 7
·
0⤊
3⤋
It’s called genocide, slavery and colonization
This is war.
It is a war based on the ideology of might makes right to plunder planet and people.
Demonstrators burn a U.S. flag during a protest in Baghdad May 19, 2007. Demonstrators took to the streets denouncing the frequent raids of the U.S. forces in Baghdad's Shia neighbourhoods. Photo: Kareem Raheem/Reuters
Demonstrators burn a U.S. flag during a protest in Baghdad May 19, 2007.
Demonstrators took to the streets denouncing the frequent raids of the U.S. forces in Baghdad's Shia neighbourhoods.
Photo: Kareem Raheem/Reuters
The bad guys are the greedy, powerful men who have and have used the weapons of mass destruction and operate the means of mass distraction to divert the potentially dangerous thoughts and passions of oppressed and exploited vast majorities everywhere.
The good guys are those who fight back by all the means available to them.
They are fighting the eternal good fight against tyranny and oppression.
They reject your venomous version of democracy and freedom.
They do not want their societies to be greed-based.
They do not want mind-numbing sexually obsessed booty calls as the leitmotif of their culture.
They do not want addictive genetically-modified foods to poison their people.
They do not want to be sold into pharmaceutical slavery with Prozac so that they can become free to be you and me.
They do not want progressive politics that progresses towards the extinction of people and planet.
They do not want religions that justify invasion and occupation.
They do not want whole populations of greedophile pod-people moved into their countries under the guise of “Jewish right of return” or “aid” or reconstruction or redevelopment.
They have seen it all before — it’s called genocide, slavery and colonization.
2007-09-09 10:35:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by Eric the Great *USA* 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
1) F (Some US & Israeli Neocons knew that 9/11 would happen & did nothing to stop it because they wanted it to happen so that America would become a terror victim like Israel & would attack any Muslim country that Bush told them they needed to attack including Iraq).
2) F
3) Some of his company knew but not Bush.
4) F
5) ?
2007-09-09 10:34:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
1. T
2. T
3. T
4. T
5. T
2007-09-09 15:51:18
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
This is not the forum for 9-11 topics; imho, US government needs to host a forum, and they will.
2007-09-09 10:35:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
4⤋
1.T-dude thats lik common sense
2.T-no dur
3.T-they planned the attck
4.T-yesyesyes
5.T-yepyep
-why?
2007-09-09 11:03:17
·
answer #8
·
answered by Opps. :) 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
F
F
T
F
DK
2007-09-09 10:31:26
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
1. - T
2. - IDK
3. - T
4. - T
5. - IDK
2007-09-09 10:34:19
·
answer #10
·
answered by Jeremiah 5
·
3⤊
2⤋