"A pure hand needs no glove to cover it."
Do you agree?
Why / why not?
2007-09-09 10:25:07 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
ahh yes The Scarlet Letter
I agree if you're faithful and strong you don't need anything to protect you from the outside.
2007-09-09 10:35:44 · answer #1 · answered by Save A Tree [Remove a Bush] 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I don't get it. What is the hand a metaphor for? Maybe a pure hand needs a glove to keep from getting corrupted?
2007-09-09 17:29:37 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No. With the way things are today the pure hand needs protection from the vile world around it.
2007-09-09 17:30:38 · answer #3 · answered by The Nana of Nana's 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
i agree because if the hand is pure then it doesn't need to be hidden. good luck.
2007-09-09 17:34:38 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It does. If it were to stick its hand into a dead animal dead on the road it would get stuff all over its clean little hands...
2007-09-09 17:32:12 · answer #5 · answered by ? 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree-- it's like, if you don't do anything wrong, you don't have anything to cover up.
2007-09-09 17:31:01 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
i agree with it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-C91A-1aAac
2007-09-09 17:29:40 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, you could be "touching something unpure"!
2007-09-09 17:30:54 · answer #8 · answered by Only me! 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes... b/c if you haven't done anything wrong, then you don't need to hide anything!
2007-09-09 17:28:52 · answer #9 · answered by organiz'd khoaz 5 · 5⤊ 0⤋