are reason and emotion equally necessary in justifying moral decisions?

Answer 1

Both are important, but moral decisions must be made with thoughtful reasoning and knowing the difference between right and wrong.

Answer 2

Yes, both are necessary but neither is sufficient. Obviously emotion without reason cannot lead to moral decision making or good decision making of any kind. But at the same time morality has an emotional valence, so it must be present to temper a solely rational decision.

Answer 3

The simple fact of a moral decision is enough, for if you have morals you do not need to show reason or emotion.

Answer 4

i might could desire to assert the proportion an the two... without reasoning we does not comprehend our thoughts, and why we've them. on the different hand we reason the history and contemporary supply use our unique thoughts that fluctuate each 2d. so as this is my handle it. so a strategies as effecting our ethical judgements reasoning can replace it. In WW2 the solders knew that killing adult men replaced into against the morals yet reasoned that so as too restore peace to the international they might prefer to do what ever it took.

Answer 5

In philosophy, the answer depends on the moral theory. In the everyday real life of most people, no.

Answer 6

I dont think so, i think that emotion can often get in the way of making the most expediant decisions.

Answer 7

most definetly. if you have all reason and no emotion then u could make a horrible mistake where you're not happy... with just emotion then u might be happy but not end up in a good position.

Answer 8

seems like a good policy for any decision, not just moral ones.

Answer 9

Yes.

Answer 10

i say emotion is almost completely invalid in this context