Could U.S. space colonies end up becoming territories or even states,like on the moon or Mars say?

Question

Or even on large astroids like Ceres too.

Answer 1

Yes, I believe it's possible it will work out that way. Of course, with the massive costs and technology needed it's possible that these colonies could become cooperative efforts. The children would never know any other lifestyle and would easily identify with each other as opposed to abstract ideas of nations like the USA or Russia.

Answer 2

The US constitution does allow for the creation of new states. Article 4, Section 3 reads: New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new State shall be formed or erected within the Jurisdiction of any other State; nor any State be formed by the Junction of two or more States, or Parts of States, without the Consent of the Legislature of the States concerned as well as of Congress.
Assuming such colonies come into existence, I am not aware of any reason they could not become states.

Answer 3

It would be better if colonies would form their own governments, we don't need our bloated federal system growing even more. By the time we actually have colonies though, this kind of discussion probably won't even be allowed.

Answer 4

relies upon on what you recommend via "we". There are actually not any plans in any respect to determine a "colony" on the two. apart from that one deepest employer that frankly stands very almost 0 risk of easily succeeding. NASA has (because of the fact the 1960's) wanted to construct a learn station on the Moon and on Mars. yet a "learn station" isn't a "colony". we've learn stations in Antarctica that are completely manned and may be comparable. The international area Station is likewise an occasion of a completely manned learn station. "Colony" implies families of human beings residing their lives there, being completely autonomous, having toddlers there, and scarcity of existence there. different than that one deepest employer there are actually not any plans to try this on the Moon or on Mars. it is going to likely be an fairly, very long term till now we've a "colony" on the two. Centuries somewhat. we decide for a "learn station" on Mars as a replace of on the Moon for quite a few motives. particularly because of the fact there's of undertaking of looking existence or previous existence on Mars, whilst there's no risk of that on the Moon. And that's fairly not likely that robotic probes could have the potential to locate this data with out boots on the floor. yet one greater reason is short sightedness. NASA initially wanted to flow precise out of the Apollo software (3 greater Apollo flights have been planned) into organising a manned station on the Moon interior the 1980's. Our elected representatives wanted to spend that money on different issues nonetheless. So we could desire to consistently have already had one on the Moon and be engaged on that one on Mars now. as to if or not Mars is greater scientifically "exciting" than the Moon nonetheless is purely a count of opinion, not certainty. And it relies upon on what form of technology you're speaking approximately. we are able to learn so plenty greater relating to the Earth from the Moon than we are able to from Mars. we will additionally learn so plenty greater relating to the very early photograph voltaic equipment from the Moon than we are able to from Mars. So, that easily relies upon on what you're searching for as to that's greater "exciting".

Answer 5

It is possible, but the farther away a place is from central government the harder it is for government to maintain control...