Paul is the only one who could win against Hillary.
Among all candidates, Dr. Paul is now first in total donations from military personnel and veterans.
Obama and McCain were second and third in donations from military and veterans.
http://phreadom.blogspot.com/2007/07/ron-paul-is-most-financially-military.html
http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2007/Q2/
1 Paul
http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2007/Q2/C00432914/A_EMPLOYER_C00432914.html
2 Obama
http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2007/Q2/C00431445/A_EMPLOYER_C00431445.html
3 McCain
http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2007/Q2/C00430470/A_EMPLOYER_C00430470.html
4 Clinton
http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2007/Q2/C00431569/A_EMPLOYER_C00431569.html
5 Richardson
http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2007/Q2/C00431577/A_EMPLOYER_C00431577.html
6 Romney
http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2007/Q2/C00431171/A_EMPLOYER_C00431171.html
7 Edwards
http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2007/Q2/C00431205/A_ELECTION_C00431205.html
8 Giuliani
http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2007/Q2/C00430512/A_EMPLOYER_C00430512.html
Tancredo, Ron Paul, and Hunter have the most conservative voting records on immigration.
http://www.betterimmigration.com/candidates/2006/prez08_gop2.html
http://www.betterimmigration.com/candidates/2006/prez08_gop3.html
http://www.betterimmigration.com/candidates/2006/prez08_gop1.html
Tancredo and Ron Paul have the best voting records for reducing government spending according to the National Taxpayers Union.
They were the only candidates to score 100 percent "A" Grades from 1992 to 2005.
http://www.ntu.org/main/page.php?PageID=97#
Sportsbook.com rates both Paul and Romney at 8 to 1 odds which is approximately an 11 percent chance of becoming the next President.
Mitt Romney's campaign only had 35 percent more cash than Ron Paul after subtracting debts on 06/30/2007.
http://herndon1.sdrdc.com/cgi-bin/cancomsrs/?_08+P80000748
http://herndon1.sdrdc.com/cgi-bin/cancomsrs/?_08+P80003353
Paul's campaign has almost 5 times as much money to spend as Tancredo.
http://herndon1.sdrdc.com/cgi-bin/cancomsrs/?_08+P80003429
Romney's contributions from individuals dropped by a third from the first quarter to the second quarter.
Paul's contributions almost quadrupled from Q1 to Q2.
http://projects.washingtonpost.com/2008-presidential-candidates/?nid=roll_08campaign
Ron Paul received more than 10 times as much in donations in the last week of June as he received in the first week of April.
http://query.nictusa.com/pres/2007/Q2/C00432914/A_DATE_C00432914.html
Ron Paul's $2.4 million in fundraising after the second quarter placed him:
4th in total receipts to date
3rd in total current assets (ahead of former front-runner John McCain, and just $800,000 behind Mitt Romney)
Thus far, 47% of the contributions made to Ron Paul's campaign are donations of under $200 from individuals (John McCain's 17% is the second-highest percentage).
http://www.usaelectionpolls.com/2008/articles/ron-paul-small-donors-love-him.html
This is a telling statistic, as it highlights the fact that most other candidates rely heavily upon donations from corporate interests and political action committees (PACs) (i.e. moneyed, influence-seeking sources who can readily afford to contribute large sums). Since Congressman Paul has always voted against special favors and privileges for anyone, special interests know they have nothing to gain by stuffing Ron Paul's campaign coffers. As one member of my local Meetup group put it on a home-made sign, "Ron Paul is thin because he won't let special interests buy him lunch."
http://www.lewrockwell.com/orig8/sutton1.html
2007-09-09 11:42:44
·
answer #1
·
answered by Eric Inri 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
it is troublesome to "win" a debate, yet i think of some of the so-called 2d tier applicants, rather those like Ron Paul and Tom Tancredo that have vast themes to press, will income some notoriety this evening. i think of Romney is approximately to crash and burn, and all and sundry is watching to be certain if McCain can income some momentum this evening. he's decrease than a lot of tension. So, there's a tremendous danger for a number of the lesser primary applicants to push their way forward. so a strategies, maximum Republicans i understand are nonetheless waiting and watching. i actual think of this early initiate will harm the front-runners, by way of fact with the aid of the time the election comes, they are going to be burned out and persons would be uninterested in them. I wager that somebody will come forward abruptly. i might like to be certain Ron Paul stand out this evening. he's have been given a lot of tremendous themes to talk approximately. i'm hoping he gets the time.
2016-10-18 11:01:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by llanos 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
He is the only person up there who is genuinely answering questions and not just hitting their pre-planned sound bites. I just watched this great google video about Ron Paul, check it out! Just like in the debates he is sincere and honest in his answers.
The video covers everything from his views on education, the war, and the role of government. Must see if you are curious about this under-reported candidate.
2007-09-09 08:37:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by Eric578 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
Here we go kiddies, the Ron Paul spammers are comming out of the woodwork again. When he doesn't even get 1% of the GOP vote in the primaries maybe they will shut up for once.
2007-09-09 08:26:07
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Saludos, y permíteme que te diga antes que nada que no te tienes que preocupar. Los hongos son un problema más común de lo que parece, y por tanto tienen soluciones más comunes de lo que parecen.
Por desgracia, muchos no lo saben y se limitan a sufrirlos, a rascarse o a aplicarse remedios que les hacen mucho más daño que bien. Pero no te preocupes, que yo te voy a ayudar.
Lo primero que deberías hacer es visitar este enlace. Si sigues las instrucciones, estoy completamente seguro de que enseguida te pondrás mejor. ¡Ánimo!
http://infeccionesporhongos.youtips.info
2014-11-11 20:26:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Ron Paul has good ideas, as far as I'm concerned he is the only one worth listening to.
2007-09-09 08:05:21
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
cause he just kick butt
http://picasaweb.google.com/J.SkyWave/FoxPoll
people who say its a few who are doing all the voting , click the link and then think of something new to say
2007-09-09 08:47:48
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I'd vote for Fred Thompson. Paul isn't conservative enough for me!
2007-09-09 08:04:03
·
answer #8
·
answered by Lover of Blue 7
·
0⤊
3⤋
he has all the answers,
2007-09-09 10:51:27
·
answer #9
·
answered by nebula 6
·
0⤊
0⤋