Such is the nature of the human race to make that probable; sorry to say.
2007-09-09 05:20:26
·
answer #1
·
answered by Happy Camper 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Too true old bean- just don't say it near your local Labour MP or you'll be sent off to the Euro-gulags.
I mean it's an opens secret isn't it? Any lower middle-class moron from the third world treks to the first world for a better life. I live in Jakarta- I know exactly what kind of people emigrate- lower middle-class who have either enough money for snake-heads or to buy a degree overseas.
Singapore is experiencing a major brain drain to Australia for exactly this reason. Ethnic Chinese run away from Indonesia as fast as they can scurry because they know they're all on borrowed time here and the natives are losing patience.
The truly poor are too damn poor to worry about anything other than where their next meal is coming from- the same with real refugees- they seek refuge in the nearest safe zone- not half-way across the globe.
I feed, clothe and educate & provide healthcare for two poor families who live in a slum district near me- and both parents work. How attractive does free basic health care, welfare, dole and housing appear to them- where in this country (Indonesia) everything is user-pay and non university-degree work is rapidly heading offshore to China?
Medicine here although cheap by Western standards- remains very expensive to the poor 60%+ of th population.
And the Spanish want to build a tunnel to Africa?
Madness- it's obviously going to be a one-way road, isn't it?
2007-09-09 06:50:20
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
There was no English, it was Great Britain who conquered the world, that means Irish, Scots, Welsh and English citizens, and now they are living with the end results of the actions from 250 years ago.
Great Britain is now a multi-cultural society as much as the Muppet's from the fascist BNP don't want to admit it.
2007-09-09 05:34:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by conranger1 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Conquered by what or whom? An attitude of absence of mind is filling the world. Persons feel they need to dominate and undo all the civilized world because they can not relate to freedom of choice. People are coming from other countries and deciding our fate of religion and culture. Who gave them this right to dominate societies with hatred and confusion?
2007-09-09 05:18:43
·
answer #4
·
answered by nsprdwmn 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
I am not sure I understand your Question. You seem to forget that the English, whatever that race is, is a mixture of races, as is almost all the Nations of the World, however, you seem to think that you had a right to occupy many of the World's Nations, and claim much of their minerals etc as your own, in your quest to Build an Empire. And now, when many of the people from those Nations want to come to the "Motherland" you turn them back. So what is your problem? please explain. .
2007-09-09 05:19:43
·
answer #5
·
answered by The Questioner 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
"we the English, as it were" - well iam for one still English, although conquering the world is in the past, and can not be held responsible for things that transpired before i was even thought of.
further more i am pretty sure they knew what they were doing back then, its not as if they absently knocked over a glass of milk, which is incidentally not worth crying over
just a few comments but it would have been better if you had posed a question...
2007-09-09 05:20:48
·
answer #6
·
answered by subaru222 2
·
2⤊
0⤋
So, let me get this straight you think England conquered 1/5th of the world as an act of absent mindedness. Wow how forgetful was Alexander the Great or Genghis Khan, They must have been sleep walking.
2007-09-09 05:16:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by john m 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
the Ottoman empire collapsed, does that advise that islam collapsed? by your good judgment of the romans and greeks then this must be genuine. they did no longer rule in spain for a a million,000 years! And it did no longer triumph over hearts and minds, (the greeks, Spaniards and hindu indians fairly hate you). I shall furnish that for the time of many places they have been a blessing, they further with them extra efficient training and a fairer (for the time) criminal framework. so if we are onto the greeks, you do understand that turkey substitute into initially greek's who the Turks effectively bred out, as with international locations like Afghanistan Iran Iraq Pakistan and Bangladesh that have been as quickly as hindu and indian. or the middle east which substitute into initially christian and the christians fought to get it returned. they weren't gained over with their hearts and midns, it substitute into jsut the case that by the time the rulers died off there wastoo little left of what substitute into before to resturn to common. additionally you're watching it in a incorrect context. the Romans weren't a faith, they have been an empire of persons who have been pagan and later christian, the comparable using fact the greeks. purely as interior the comparable way the ottoman empire substitute into no longer a faith, it substitute into an empire ruled by muslims. as properly Islam is designed to slowly positioned on away at a inhabitants till that's the final public, it is the hollow purpose of the Dhmiddi, why a muslim women can not marry a non muslim guy yet vic e verso is suitable, why slavery is suitable in islam etc. are not getting me incorrect Islam is a winners faith, that's ruthless in that's skill to alter into the single absolute, yet this would not make it magnificent, it makes it ruthless.
2016-10-10 06:19:41
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Absence of mind = Presence of mind.
2007-09-09 07:42:36
·
answer #9
·
answered by rumeoui 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
We the English as it were didn't understand a word of that!
2007-09-09 05:14:15
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
0⤋