English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I think that they simply reflect the time in history, and that the books, paticuarly Huck Finn, is actually non-racist because it shows how the poor young white breaks away from his prejudices and views Jim as a human being with feelings instead of property.

2007-09-09 04:58:38 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities Books & Authors

6 answers

Twain's use of the n-word is not racist. In his time it was not a pejorative, but simply a slang word, no worse than the word "ain't."
In fact, "Huckleberry Finn" is perhaps the first American novel showing a black person as fully human. Jim was portrayed as an admirable human being; loving, thoughtful, and not a slave at heart. He was like a father to Huck, a homeless white boy, protecting him and providing moral guidance.

2007-09-09 05:09:36 · answer #1 · answered by The First Dragon 7 · 3 0

If the "n-word" is used as dialogue for a racist character it is simply appropriate for that character. But the books themselves are not racist. The only time you can call a book racist is if the primary message of the story is intolerance and racial prejudice. But in today's age we are losing sight of the difference.

2007-09-09 13:16:51 · answer #2 · answered by rohak1212 7 · 1 0

That was the language of his day. The book is far from racist. And Twain, the least racist of all white American writers, up to then.

2007-09-09 15:58:41 · answer #3 · answered by Letizia 6 · 0 0

no of course not. Your right, it reflects that time in history when almost everyone used the "n" word. Its not a racist book.

2007-09-09 12:04:24 · answer #4 · answered by Maya 2 · 1 0

No. It was just the era in which he lived, unfortunately.

2007-09-09 12:06:29 · answer #5 · answered by S 5 · 0 0

I think you asked, and answered, your own question.

2007-09-09 12:01:45 · answer #6 · answered by Ice 6 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers