I've always liked McCain. Although he flip flops on occasion, he's less dishonest than most
2007-09-09 04:04:40
·
answer #1
·
answered by The prophet of DOOM 5
·
3⤊
5⤋
No. McCain's past service to America was honoralbe in the highest degree--which makes his betrayal of this country all the more tragic.
McCain chose to abondon his principles when he called for turning American ports' security over to foreign nationals from Dubai. He has compounded this by calling for a draft to force Americans to fight in a war the American people have made it abundantly clear they do not and wil not support. In both cases he has turned his back on both the best interests of Aerica and the moral principles of our country. He cannot be trusted to remain in high office, much less as President.
2007-09-09 04:13:24
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
He was the the best candidate in 2000, but you see what that got him... a major league Rove bashing... And this time around he decided not to be the Mavrick any more... there are much better candidates out there!
2007-09-09 04:12:41
·
answer #3
·
answered by Gabe_the_Man82 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
NO.I haven't liked McCain since he and Kerry began their smear job against MIA families back in the early nineties.They called them "deluded and dangerous",and blocked their attempts to get information the government had concerning their loved ones,especially information that may have shed light in his captivity.He's a man who has secrets...
2007-09-09 04:09:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
No. he has age and health issues. But the real problem is his stance on Iraq which may be a psychological hold over from his days as a POW.
An admirable man. An heroic man. A man of discipline and integrity, but not a presidential man.
2007-09-09 04:08:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by fredrick z 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
At least John McCain understands the consequences of fighting a war.
2007-09-09 04:06:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Ron Paul '08. Look him up on youtube, or do a search. This is the only one I'd put in the oval office to restore our liberties... I have a hard time trusting all the other cronies, especially with the war in Iraq, the Patriot Act, "homeland security" with practically no border north and south of the U.S. thanks to Bush (look up North American Union) on youtube or do a search, thank the Clintons and the Bushes for Nafta, sorry
2007-09-09 04:16:57
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I gave up on McCain a while ago, but really after cosponsoring that stupid immigrant amnesty bill with Kennedy I thought everyone else did too.
But hey, you're entitled!
2007-09-09 06:47:49
·
answer #8
·
answered by whitiepossum 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Lacking any evidence even remotely suggesting that this is so, I not only don't believe it, I don't even suspect that it might be so.
He will never be forgiven for McCain-Feingold. It was probably the stupidest bill to hit the floor in fifty years. It just proves he's unqualified for any responsibility more significant than caring for Leona Helmsley's dog.
2007-09-09 04:08:40
·
answer #9
·
answered by open4one 7
·
3⤊
1⤋
No! He's a warmongering S.O.B.
Our present Warmonger-in-Thief, who lied to get us INTIO this illegal (undeclared) war, subsequently became the worst mass-murderer since Pol Pot. McCain would simply continue that tragic legacy as a war criminal.
2007-09-09 04:14:53
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Ron Paul is the only candidate that upholds the Constitution.
2007-09-09 04:12:34
·
answer #11
·
answered by KD7ONE 5
·
0⤊
1⤋