i was listening to conservative talk show last night and they had the chief of the military white house detail..he waited till he retired and has written a book, (my apologies for not having his name or a source)..it really speaks volumes about this woman...he also called her "EVIL".
2007-09-09 02:31:28 · 25 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
sangria...would you had prefered had i not disclosed that info?
2007-09-09 02:51:33 · update #1
She was just being concerned for their well-being.She didnt want them to turn to stone!
2007-09-09 02:37:47 · answer #1 · answered by Kev L 6 · 7⤊ 8⤋
The book was dishonarable duty, it was primarily written about how bad as a commander and chief Bill Clinton was.
It's a well known fact that the liberal administrations, no matter which we are speaking of, is very anti military. That explains why when we get a Republican in office, the first priority is to rebuild the military. That would be the one reason we've had so much trouble in Iraq, the military was drained dry from 92 to 00.
The name of the author escapes me, I read it sometime ago... However I can't recall his name. He is the Airforce aide, who carried the "football".
The shame in all of this is the American people forget what a horrid administration the Clintons were. The likelyhood that Hillary will get elected is pretty high... Which means America as a whole, will once again be pretty low!
I looked on Amazon... it's called Deraliction of Duty... it tells of the way he took the security of America with a grain of thought, it should be read by every American. Pay attention to the part where he had the chance to take Bin Laden out.. twice but he would rather watch or play golf!
2007-09-09 09:44:07 · answer #2 · answered by damond h 6 · 3⤊ 3⤋
Knowing the military as I do after working with them for
a lifetime---I can understand why any 1st lady ( in particular
Hello Dolly Madison ) would give this some thought---tho
I doubt that any of them acted on it !I
I was fortunate at one time to work as a Civilian Expert
at the side of a Bird Colonel who saw active duty during
the Korean Conflict ----he was a West Pointer--
--during a time when USO troupes with
some attractive ladies volunteered to perform for
the troupes---The Colonel gave a blistering
"dressing down" to a young Lieutenant who was
out of line---as we call it !
Being an Officer and a Gentleman---Col.T.K. never
waited for a request---or demand as you put it---
he believed in teaching his troops the right way to
behave in war and in peace---as he put it.
Recommended reading---other volumes that tell
of Hilary's less than evil attempts at legislation for
the common good---such as a Health Program
that would have cost much less than the evil
expenditures of money in Iraq !
And by the way---I accept your apology---
For listening to Conservative talk shows !
2007-09-09 10:33:03 · answer #3 · answered by ytellu 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Truthfully, M. Emmett Tyrell also made mention of it in his book, The Clinton Crack Up, as did the former Chief of the FBI White House Liaison Office so that's three sources. What you didn't mention was that, on a trip to New York City Hillary threw a hissy fit because things weren't moving fast enough and they abandoned the Military Officer who was carrying the "Football" (the attache case containing all the Nation's nuclear launch codes) in Manhattan. The Officer had to take a taxicab to catch up with them. Doesn't that give you the warm fuzzies about the Clintons?
2007-09-09 11:19:17 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Anybody can SAY anything. More often than not these "facts" are unsubstantiated and lack any foundation in fact or substantial evidence. Where else would you hear this but on some right wing talk show. Strange that we still consider anything in print "fact", in spite of all the garbage that has been printed.
2007-09-09 09:42:27 · answer #5 · answered by acydskull 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
So you cant prove what you are saying??
How convienient for your rant!!
Just because some guy claims it happened in his book, dosent really mean it did, after all paper never refuses ink!!
2007-09-09 13:23:07 · answer #6 · answered by conranger1 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I do not find any thing wrong inb what she asked. It is a matter of opnion, the retired chief can have his and so can you. o me it looks like a matter of respect.
2007-09-09 09:40:18 · answer #7 · answered by jittender k 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
He obviously did not like her. and beings how she is running for office now it magic how this comes out all the sudden. Political retardedness if you ask me. That's why so many people are turned off of voting. I cannot stand the infantile slandering and drama!
I couldnt vote for Obama--sounds to close to Osama.
2007-09-09 09:39:15 · answer #8 · answered by melissaw77 5 · 6⤊ 2⤋
While you quote from these sources, I'm afraid nobody with a half-decent education will take you seriously.
2007-09-09 10:05:55 · answer #9 · answered by Tokoloshimani 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Most in Uniform have the same opinion of the *****. Memories of the Clinton years were not rosy ones for me.
2007-09-09 09:47:33 · answer #10 · answered by lana_sands 7 · 2⤊ 3⤋
It was for their own safety. It is like being in a junkyard with the pitt bull. You dont want to make eye contact, and you dont make ..any..........sudden.........moves........
2007-09-09 09:59:14 · answer #11 · answered by bro_tj1 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋