Baucus (D-MT)
Bayh (D-IN)
Biden (D-DE)
Breaux (D-LA)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Carnahan (D-MO)
Carper (D-DE)
Cleland (D-GA)
Clinton (D-NY)
Daschle (D-SD)
Dodd (D-CT)
Dorgan (D-ND)
Edwards (D-NC)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Harkin (D-IA)
Hollings (D-SC)
Johnson (D-SD)
Kerry (D-MA)
Kohl (D-WI)
Landrieu (D-LA)
Lieberman (D-CT)
Lincoln (D-AR)
Miller (D-GA)
Nelson (D-FL)
Nelson (D-NE)
Reid (D-NV)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Schumer (D-NY)
Torricelli (D-NJ)
2007-09-09 00:44:47 · 16 answers · asked by Locutus1of1 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I left out the republicans because it is the Democrats that are screaming. Your top candidates for President are on this list.
If you think Bush is wrong then you must think these people are the stupidest humans on earth.
Why would you then turn around and tout them as qualified to run the country if they don't even bother to read what hey sign.
2007-09-09 01:05:10 · update #1
Yes, of course they are responsible.
2007-09-09 02:29:19 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Well, we can see who read your question. Here's a news flash people, Tony Blair and Osama Bin Laden do not have a vote in the American Congress. I also love the anti-semetic rant. The thing is that all these disengenuous Democrats would have you believe that they were sonehow duped into voting for the war by the other side, which is an out and out lie. We can all tell when Democrats are lying; their lips are moving.
2007-09-09 01:30:43 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
You left out the Republicans, and, more interesting, that only 6 Senators on both sides of the aisle bothered to read a top secret briefing on Iraq, prior to casting their votes to give authority to the Bush administration to choose war if diplomatic efforts failed. The report was quite ambiguous about Iraq having WMD's and ties to Al Qaeda.
2007-09-09 00:59:21 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Bush lied about WMDs to convince everyone to go to war. No WMDs, no terrorist links, no 9/11 participation, lots of lies to Congress and the American people.
Okay, for the person who thinks that attacking Iraq was scary to the terrorists. A) 80% of the terrorists were Saudis. We're giving them MORE weapons right now. Go figure.
B) NO terrorists were Iraqi
C) Saddam despite all his bad attributes HATED Al Qaeda and terrorists. (Mostly, he wanted to be the only one in charge.) He kept the terrorists down. By removing him, we MADE a ton more terrorists.
D) Saddam, being of a different sect, also provided a balance to Iran who probaby IS making WMDs.
E) We are not scaring the terrorists, we are giving them fodder to recuirt-"Evil Americans occupying Iraq"
Someone PLEASE tell me the real reason we attacked Iraq.
2007-09-09 03:36:02 · answer #4 · answered by punxy_girl 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
So you think 9/11 should have just been 'let go?' Do you think they would have not done something else if we would let it go? Do you think the US would even be here today if we let it all go?
If no one did anything when there are attacks on us, then obviously there would be MORE attacks on us. Obviously other countries would think they could get away with it and then we would be in a war HERE. Would that be better for you?
Oh, also, 9/11 has a lot to do with the current war. It does not matter WHO attacked us as terrorists. IF we were to let it go and do nothing, ANY OTHER COUNTRY would think us weak and invade. Nothing can be let go in that manner. AND all of you who outwardly do not support our leaders are making it just a little harder to end the war because you are not UNITED and you show it to everyone from everywhere.
2007-09-09 00:49:55 · answer #5 · answered by AveGirl 5 · 4⤊ 3⤋
Actually, I blame UBL and al qaeda (piss be upon them). The world wide struggle with these raving space loons will go on until they are annihilated or the whole world is conquered and assimilated by their jihad. Total resistance may be the only answer here.
2007-09-09 01:15:35 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You forgot to enter Osama Bin Laden to your list. If it weren't for his actions in the last 15 years , we would not have been in the position in the first place. What really matters is winning not whining.
2007-09-09 00:51:09 · answer #7 · answered by meathead 5 · 5⤊ 1⤋
You're missing ALL of the GOP congressmen, buddy. The question is un-biasly stated, so you have to list them ALL.
After all, there are a few GOP that want us out. Hagel & Smith are two that come to mind.
2007-09-09 01:05:13 · answer #8 · answered by amg503 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
They voted to authorize Bush to go to war if he found it neccessary, not to invade and occupy. But yes, I hold them accountable, because that was like giving the keys to the 'vette to a drunken blind guy.
I also hold them accountable for not impeaching the worst criminals to ever hold office in this country, and who even broke the law to obtain the office in the first place.
That's a big difference between Dems and repubs....Dems love their country more than they love their party.
On the flip side, since you are obviously a Bushie, these Dems must be OK in your view, and worthy of your consideration. But I doubt that.
Has the RNC sent you today's version of the truth yet?
2007-09-09 00:55:43 · answer #9 · answered by commandercody70 4 · 2⤊ 4⤋
The funny thing is that none of the names you've mentioned, nor in all probability any relative of any person named will ever get on the actual battlefield.
2007-09-09 00:49:40 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Bush was the commander of the forces not these politicians
2007-09-09 01:40:23 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋