English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Specifically, if you knew that sacrificing the lives of (X) amount of people would result in world peace, would you let those people die? If yes, how many lives would you be willing to sacrifice?

2007-09-09 00:27:36 · 15 answers · asked by theoryparker 3 in Arts & Humanities Philosophy

15 answers

I guess I would let you down then, because I couldn't sacrifice anyone. Whom am I to ever say anyone should die??? I would fight for your life....I would fight to save anyone. I still want world peace...We would have to find another way.....

2007-09-09 00:34:13 · answer #1 · answered by missNewBooty 2 · 0 0

No way! They are after all still human beings, no matter what they did. Even though sacrificing them might bring about world peace, nice people will evolve become like them again. It will never end so there's no point in wishing them to die.

2007-09-09 00:37:01 · answer #2 · answered by HopeGrace 4 · 0 0

The only way to bring world peace is to END THE WARS
End the terrorism act:)

Love among everyone....:)

Brings World Peace:)

2007-09-09 00:31:07 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I would extinct Money, Religion, and Democracy.. that vile triad of evil, which we have coated humanity with, which is devouring humanity as fast and hard as it can... Money is spending humanity and Life faster than the planet can repair and restore... One day the planet will simply run out of life because of humanity following America's mindless, thoughtless, careless, lead into and down hell's great gullet...

I would re-assess humanity, and define humanity as being an Honest, Sharing, Loving, Dignified, Caring, Conscious Entity...

I would build a mile high steel reinforced concrete wall around the United States to totally isolate America from the rest of world.. for it is America's insatiable greed and glut for money, and their militarily fulfilling of their insane 13-Colonies Salemish/Boston Tea Partyish/Inquisitionish, policy, which is responsible for the messes the world is in today...


See: http://www.femalefirst.co.uk/board/about151018.html

2007-09-09 01:02:39 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

I would bring world peace by attacking everyone that didn't agree with me and forcing them to comply. Then when I'm the supreme ruler, there would be peace

2007-09-09 00:35:19 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

The only way to achieve world peace is to destroy every human life except 1.

2007-09-09 11:37:50 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Make a world leader so every thing is under his/her watch. Now there will be plannet earth not just america or australia or some other like India or Nepal.

2007-09-09 00:32:16 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

as many as it takes,which probably means all except 1. So although there would be peace it could only last a single lifetime till the sole survivor died.

2007-09-09 00:35:44 · answer #8 · answered by franken4110 2 · 0 0

I cannot sacrifice anybody so my theory would be to take away the right of a political ruler to send troops to support his/her personal views about another nation state. The politicians would then be in the position of having to find another way of sorting out their differences.
Without the right to declare war, the world would find a better way of living together.

2007-09-09 00:40:31 · answer #9 · answered by John R 3 · 0 1

All of them. World peace is not my responsibility. Until the "world" is ready for peace, it is a fool's folly.

2007-09-09 04:18:24 · answer #10 · answered by guru 7 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers