what mathematical equation &/or scientific analysis can illustrate/prove on how did a Big Bang DUST EVOLVE?

Question

We all know that once a deceased human body decompose it returns to its natural form - DUST
Therefore, what relative mathematical equation &/or advance scientific analysis can illustrate/prove on how did a Big Bang DUST EVOLVE into a breathing cells, with circulating blood & an electrical charge that stimulates the heart & brain?

Answer 1

Life evolved on Earth some billions of years after the big bang.
When the BB happened all the galaxies,stars, planets and life didn't just spring into being.
You will need an understanding of Quantum Mechanics to follow the sequence of events just after the BB but the basics are:
1. For reasons we are not yet sure of, a singularity exploded producing a massive amount of energy and space/time.
2. The small universe that came into being started to expand from the energy input.
3. As it cooled and interacted the energy coalesced into sub-atomic particles.
4. Some time later with further cooling and expansion of space/time the sub-atomic particles started to clump together to produce hydrogen atoms.
5. The enormous clouds of hydrogen began to be slowly drawn together by gravity.
6. When sufficient hydrogen contracted under its own gravitational pull, it got hotter and hotter and more and more squeezed together until the hydrogen atoms started to fuse together to form helium. This exactly the same reaction as a hydrogen bomb but when it is that big ,we call it a star.
7. These "Population I " stars were very big indeed and they quickly ran through the series of fusion reactions until the produced iron. When the iron stage is reached a star can no longer provide enough energy for fusion to continue, So the star implodes.
8. This implosion is called a "Super Nova" and the force of the implosion was so great that the energy released triggered further fusion and in a blink of the eye, all the other elements were created and blown off into space.
9. The elemental 'dust' and gases went through the same coalescing into stars again but this time they were surrounded by a big disc of dust and gas which eventually clumped into the planets.
10. The planets that formed contained all the elements in nature and when the Earth cooled enough so that liquid water
could exist a vast range of molecular gases like methane , ammonia, carbon dioxide and formaldehyde etc began to be dissolved into pools of water.
11. At this time there was no free oxygen in the air so there was no ozone layer to protect the Earths surface from solar radiation and the large amount of volcanic activity on the settling planet was throwing more gases and dust into the atmosphere, generating gigantic lightning storms.
12. A billion years after the Earth was formed, the constant electrical and radiation bombardment of the chemically laden water caused the chemicals to bond together in increasingly complex molecules.
13. Some of these molecules were amino acids, lipids and simple proteins. These molecules slowly began to produce the building blocks of life and eventually the conditions were right for the first life on Earth to form.
14. This early life was probably similar to viruses but it was life and it began to adapt to the conditions and grew more complex until they produced bacteria.
15. These bacteria were what are called anaerobic bacteria. That is they do not use oxygen, in fact oxygen is a deadly poison to them.
16. The constant pressure of evolution finally produced an organism that utilized sunlight (photosynthesis) by building chlorophyl and the first plants were born.
17. these primitive plants released oxygen into the environment and the atmosphere. The free oxygen modified the atmosphere and produced an ozone layer so that the conditions that caused life to evolved ceased to exist but life now existed on planet Earth and constant adaption to conditions has spawned the myriad of life forms that grace our (once) fair planet.

This is the way we came into existence and I reckon its a far greater adventure than the Genesis fairy tale.

Answer 2

There are only observations and evidence to back up the generally accepted ideas of the origin of the Universe and that of the Earth almost ten billion years later. There is no single mathematical equation and there is no proof. Rather hundreds if not thousands of mathematical equations can express the observed relationship between many of the facts. There is rarely proof in science.

There are only observation and evidence to back up the theory of evolution. When written on paper and kept as modern and fossil specimens this evidence would need large buildings to store it all.

There is no evidence to back up scriptural stories of creation, whether extracted from the Jewish - Christian Bible, the Koran, Buddhist, Hindu or any other scripture. None. Zero. Zilch. Nada. Nothing. All there is, is unsupported assertions and in some cases flat out lies.

One thing science has done in the way of proof though is to prove that these creation stories are wrong.

Science has nothing to say about the existence of Yahweh, Abraham, Brahma, Moses, Buddha, Zoroaster, David, Solomon, Jesus, Paul, Mohammed and any other figure except perhaps for Noah as portrayed in the Bible. It is quite clear that some of these persons were historical. What has been written about them may have had little to do with the facts.

Answer 3

Look up 'cosmic chemical evolution', 'gravity', 'strong and weak nuclear forces', and a book called 'The First Three Minutes'. That should answer all of your questions.

Answer 4

your question is so far removed from actual scientific facts that it's essentially meaningless. don't try to get your science from the bible.