English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The English Prime Minister is talking of removeing His Troops from Iraq. Should Johnny Howard remove his head from GWB's rear end and do the same?

2007-09-07 20:54:33 · 7 answers · asked by Dick E knee 3 in Politics & Government Politics

7 answers

The Australian (or Austrian??) troops are under the command of the British so we should really be pulling out with them but Johnny wants to hand them over to the US brass.

God knows where they will end up if that happens - Bush doesn't seem to know where he is so I can't see that he will be steering anyone else in the right direction!

2007-09-07 22:54:40 · answer #1 · answered by cutsie_dread 5 · 3 0

YES - I think he should, certainly in the next 12 months at the most.
Whether we have achieved anything or not by being there, it is time for the IRAQ Govt to "stand up and be counted".
The longer we are there, the more chance there is of our military personnel getting killed - and what for ?
It would be great if they could be home for this Christmas, but I guess that would be "pushing our luck".
.

2007-09-07 21:08:25 · answer #2 · answered by mountie 3 · 4 0

Now that Tony Blairs removed his head from GWB s rear end, there should be plenty room to pull his out, ( And his troops )

2007-09-08 00:30:25 · answer #3 · answered by Normms 3 · 4 0

Ditto to your question and Molly's answer, Just can't get his fat head past Dubya's sphincter muscle.

Serves him right... He got himself into that mess... Now he can't get himself out. Bit like a Chinese finger puzzle that one.

I don't reckon he will do anything about it. It would be too much like saying "sorry" I reckon he'll leave it to big Kev to clean up - much like so many of his other messes

2007-09-07 22:13:34 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

I additionally sense keen approximately this besides. He despatched our boys into Iraq badly geared up for the form of venture and not something looks to have more suitable on the score. he's an boastful bullheaded guy and not making use of a concience. i does not waste my time taking him to courtroom over the concern of war crimes. the money raised for a civil action could be greater advantageous spent on looking after the strolling wounded through fact they have been badly enable down by ability of this bathe besides. and additionally you're top and incorrect Frisky as we did not purchase his argument for WMD yet we weren't united sufficient to stop the war in Iraq. basically human beings capability can stop those form of issues from going on and we as a us of a ARE fortunately led like lambs to the slaughter those days. something for an undemanding existence eh! shame on US ALL.

2016-10-18 07:32:29 · answer #5 · answered by giardina 4 · 0 0

Yes, he should withdraw from Irak. He needs your troups to fight against Hugo Chávez in Venezuela.

Chávez is the 3rd world Hitler. The world won't be a safe place meanwhile Chávez stay alive.

I've heard he will put Iran missiles in Cuba pointing to U.S.A.

Doesn't it remind you the cold war?

2007-09-07 21:03:39 · answer #6 · answered by Entrada de Datos 5 · 0 3

Yes he should but he wont because as you said his head is so far up Georges butt he cant think for himself or Australia anymore.

2007-09-07 21:39:57 · answer #7 · answered by molly 7 · 4 0

fedest.com, questions and answers