the movie is amazing and should most definitely not be graded on the camera work. they move the camera around so that you feel like you are there
2007-09-07 19:28:07 · 8 answers · asked by captainwinters1944 2 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Movies
Didn't see the movie yet. Does the camera move around all the time like the camera guy has epilepsy? The reason I never watched an episode of NYPD Blue was for that same reason. I think it's a technique that shouldn't be used in any type of film making. Why do you think they have image stabilizers on cameras? I think that technique shows a lack of professionalism.
2007-09-07 20:01:36 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Because the camera work sucks - I get it, it gives a certain feel of being in the action . . . but use a little restraint.
I agree the movie was pretty darn decent - I just think it would have been better without the throbbing headache generated by the spastic camera work.
If you like that style, fine - - - I don't
2007-09-07 20:06:45 · answer #2 · answered by The Corinthian 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
i agree for example look at the movie crank look at how they did the camera in that the camera made it more interesting then what it was if it was did like traditional films would it have been more effective why not it wouldnt and for my conclusion if anyone dont like the camera shots or what not why not go out and do better and quit complaining
old saying goes
put up or shut up
2007-09-07 19:38:11 · answer #3 · answered by iron9567 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I felt the camera work was a bit shaky for a while but then I told myself that I just had to accept it the way it was and that it was one of the things that kept the movie really 'going'.
2007-09-08 04:25:11 · answer #4 · answered by sg-7 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
definite... very almost the entire action picture replaced into filmed with a "shaking digicam." My lady buddy and that i observed the action picture final night... and HATED the shaking. And, you may forget approximately bearing directly to the action scenes, because you will never have the capability to comprehend what's happening. All you will see is a gaggle of quite quickly "digicam jerking" backward and forward. it incredibly is a form of issues that make you ask your self why in the worldwide did they arrive to a decision to action picture it that way. right it incredibly is a reasonably sturdy action picture, with a marginally sturdy tale line and clearly, it incredibly is gonna herald a lotta money. So, why disappoint the viewer by making them war to maintain their eyes on the show screen. Even the "non-action" scenes (like 2 people sitting in an workplace discussing Bourne's modern area) have that very same stressful "digicam flow". a individual can easily get dizzy attempting to observe it. For me, it completely ruined the action picture.
2016-12-31 16:32:47 · answer #5 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
People who play fast-pace video games had no trouble keeping up with the camera. It's those people who are so conventional and traditional with cinema that seems to pick and bite at any new innovation that comes in.
2007-09-07 19:54:01 · answer #6 · answered by Joey T 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Why do people keep B*** ... because they are spoiled!
American are so used to being force fed our movies that when something is different -- even if it works for that movie -- some of the them have to complain and tear the director (who was French? Right?) down because it isn't what they are used to.
It is like Crouching Dragon that was out a few years ago... Americans just didn't get that movie because we don't know how to follow something like. I don't get it, honestly, but wish I did. I know that it is training -- or learning -- on my part...
2007-09-07 19:45:08 · answer #7 · answered by toonew2two 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
i though 2 was in desperate need of a steady cam myself
havent seen 3 yet
2007-09-07 21:07:08 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋