http://youtube.com/watch?v=eUxQadgSkoA
I don't support him but still isn't that being a little bit ridiculous. Its only a 20 second clip.
2007-09-07 19:12:59 · 22 answers · asked by James 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
wow man,
thank you
RON PAUL 2008,
2007-09-07 19:17:15 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 8⤊ 2⤋
Hannitized!. I'd like to also know who it was that giggled or laughed whenever RP had a question or was asked a question during the debates on Fox. Was it one of the other candidates, or was it one of the hosts?
That's just rude, and very, very, intentional if you have studied sociology, or even Frank Luntz at all. The desired effect is to imprint a casual watcher's mind with "whatever comes next is easily dismissed & don't think this makes any sense, as well as, he's not one of us". Humans tend to respond to herd mentality, myself included, except I see it for what it is a lot of the time.
2007-09-07 20:39:50 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Neither. what's maximum possibly is that Fox has "low innovations electorate" who do no longer understand a fact from an opinion and who do no longer understand a thank you to do their own learn. The U.S. media are quickly being monopolized by way of a dwindling form of determine companies, all of whom have conservative financial agendas. The media are additionally critically based upon companies for promoting. hence, the information basically approximately thoroughly ignores company crime, besides as professional-hard artwork and professional-client subject concerns. Surveys of reporters practice that the traditional public have been in my view liberal interior the Nineteen Eighties, yet right this moment they are centrists, with greater conservatives than liberals on financial subject concerns. although, no learn has shown that they provide their own bias to the information. on the different hand, the political spectrum of pundits -- who do have interaction in noisy editorializing -- leans heavily to the suitable. the main severe occasion of it is talk radio, the place liberals are basically approximately nonexistent. The fairness Doctrine become designed to keep away from one-sided bias interior the media by way of requiring broadcasters to air opposing perspectives. It as quickly as enjoyed the super help of the two liberals and conservatives. yet now that the media have become increasingly greater owned and controlled by way of companies, conservatives defiantly oppose the fairness Doctrine. it is in all risk the main suitable evidence that the media's bias is conservative, no longer liberal.
2016-10-19 23:08:09 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Typical Fox News. Thanks for the clip. America needs a protectionist like Ron Paul claims to be. Corporate republicans want to own the globe so i dount that he will get the nomination even though he is winning the debates.
2007-09-07 21:08:12 · answer #4 · answered by Guardian 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
When Democrats, liberals and leftwingers said Fox News lies, no one believed them. Now that they have been caught in a lying about a Republican, will the neocons finally believe that Fox News is just a propaganda machine?
2007-09-07 23:13:56 · answer #5 · answered by xg6 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Gee thanks man. It's always refreshing to see FuX news go down in flames again. I ended up watching some of the other Ron Paul vids. But then I got side tracked for 45 mins watching Chuck Norris vids.
2007-09-07 21:37:51 · answer #6 · answered by Octal040 4 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Was that the final poll result? Wow! Interesting clip. Does anyone trust FOX anyways? Didn't know Ron Paul did so well. Clearly a nice youtube pro Paul clip though.
2007-09-07 19:31:07 · answer #7 · answered by jimmyp 3 · 4⤊ 4⤋
does it surprise you -- don't forget fox was first to give debates to g w bush who can't argue his way out of a wet paper bag and the other stations followed like a pack of horned dogs.
we have had a decade of media owned by only 4 corporations. i really don't know why anyone expects whats on their tv to even vaguely resmemble reality -- i mean seriously do you have to have everything in every commericial? shut the thing off -- its got a switch.
2007-09-07 19:25:00 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
he didnt lie. If you dont believe me just check out the results this january when Ron Paul doesnt even rate on the radar.
2007-09-07 23:07:05 · answer #9 · answered by Avatar_defender_of_the_light 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
If someone says that it is raining cats and dogs, do you expect to see cats and dogs falling from the sky? or do you just know that is another way of saying it is raining real hard? Why then would dialing by the second not also mean that there are a lot of calls coming in.
What is ridiculous is the big deal you are making over a comment that you assumed to be true.
By the way, the guy on the screen, Colmes, he is the liberal so maybe all liberals lie.
2007-09-07 19:21:11 · answer #10 · answered by justgetitright 7 · 4⤊ 6⤋
This is a commentator responding to something he found surprising. Calling this a "lie" is just dumb. For one thing, the commentator may not have even known you couldn't vote multiple times. Rather than focusing on crap like this, why not talk about something that really matters - like what the candidates actually said.
And for what it's worth, I am not a Republican, I do not watch FOX news, and I didn't watch the debates.
2007-09-07 19:19:14 · answer #11 · answered by Justin H 7 · 5⤊ 5⤋